Determinants for the adoption of angiotensin II receptor blockers by general practitioners

Abstract

Results of studies conducted 10-20 years ago show the prominence of commercial information sources in the adoption process of new drugs. Over the past decade, there has been a growing emphasis on practicing evidence-based medicine in drug prescribing. This raises the question whether professional information sources currently counterbalance the influence of commercial information sources in the adoption process. The aim of this study was to identify determinants influencing the adoption of a new drug class, the angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), by general practitioners (GPs) in The Netherlands. A retrospective study was conducted to assess prevalent ARB prescribing for hypertensive patients using the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) database. We conducted a survey among all GPs who participated in the IPCI project in 2003 to assess their exposure to commercial and professional information sources, perceived benefits and risks of ARBs, perceived influences of the professional network, and general characteristics. Multilevel logistic regression was applied to identify determinants of ARB adoption while adjusting for patient characteristics. Data were obtained from 70 GPs and 9470 treated hypertensive patients. A total of 1093 patients received ARBs (12%). GPs who reported frequent use of commercial information sources were more likely to prescribe ARBs routinely in preference to other antihypertensives, whereas GPs who used a prescribing decision support system and those who were involved in pharmacotherapy education were less likely to prescribe ARBs. Other factors that were associated with higher levels of ARB adoption included a more positive perception of ARBs regarding their effectiveness in lowering blood pressure, and working in single-handed practices or in rural areas. Aside from determinants related to the patient population, adoption of a new drug class among Dutch GPs is still determined more by their reliance on promotional information than by their use of professional information sources. r

How Quickly Do Physicians Adopt New Drugs? The Case of Second-Generation Antipsychotics

“…It could be that high-volume prescribers are disproportionately likely to treat treatment-refractory patients, and thus more likely to try new products soon after they come on the market. Alternatively, high-volume prescribers may be more likely to be targeted by drug manufacturer marketing efforts (29,30). …”

Essential to increase the use of generics in Europe to maintain comprehensive health care?

“…This includes measures to lower the price of generics as well as increase their utilisation versus originators and patented products in the class or related classes. Typically, multiple measures and initiatives are needed to appreciably change prescribing behaviour given the considerable resources spent by pharmaceutical companies on promotional activities and their known influence [120][121][122][123][124][125]. Consequently, we believe these many reforms and initiatives are here to stay particularly in Europe given the current economic situation coupled with ageing populations, rising patient expectations and the continued launch of new premium priced drugs.…”

Role of Patient and Practice Characteristics in Variance of Treatment Quality in Type 2 Diabetes between General Practices

“…Healthcare providers’ personal preferences, knowledge and habits can influence treatment decisions. For example, physicians may differ in their preferences for certain types of treatment, or in their reluctance or keenness to prescribe [10, 17, 18]. In addition, practice characteristics, such as practice type, size, consultation time, and the presence of support staff have been found to influence prescribing behavior [19, 20].…”