2015
DOI: 10.15640/ijhs.v3n4a5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants and Use of Family Planning Among Young Women (18-28 Years) Attending Health Facilities in Garu-Tempane District of Ghana

Abstract: Background: Improving family planning use across Sub-Saharan Africa is critical for improving women's health outcomes. Aim: We aim to provide new perspectives of family planning use in a rural setting of Ghana. Method: Applying a descriptive cross-sectional design, a total of 720 young women attending health facilities were interviewed with a questionnaire whiles 40 other participants were engaged in focus group discussions. Six in-depth interviews with midwives were conducted. Quantitative data was analysed u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that geographic factors arbitrated by rural residence and access (transport/distance) impact prenatal and postnatal care. This corroborates the existing evidence across Ghana that a woman’s rural context impacts on maternity and reproductive care utilisation [ 30 32 ]. There is also overwhelming evidence to support these factors as mediators for safe maternity care in Ghana and across developing countries [ 7 , 11 , 29 , 33 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We found that geographic factors arbitrated by rural residence and access (transport/distance) impact prenatal and postnatal care. This corroborates the existing evidence across Ghana that a woman’s rural context impacts on maternity and reproductive care utilisation [ 30 32 ]. There is also overwhelming evidence to support these factors as mediators for safe maternity care in Ghana and across developing countries [ 7 , 11 , 29 , 33 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%