Abstract:This paper examines determinants and outcomes of price premium and loyalty on a food product.The study attempts to fill this gap by offering new insights into consumer's perspectives, as concerns food marketing, and to empirically test a model that includes five determinants or drivers: awareness, corporate social responsibility, origin, quality, and positioning. Furthermore, the greater or weaker impact of price premium and loyalty on their outcomes have been also studied, specifically, the influence that wor… Show more
“…Over the last four decades, research on customer loyalty factors has been a prolific field. Marketing scholars [9,11,[13][14][15][16][18][19][20] have developed and validated more than one hundred different factors determining customer loyalty. Classifications of factors determining customer loyalty show that researchers' opinions on collections of factors vary.…”
“…Price is viewed as an important factor, especially for middle-income earners and/or in commodity-based sectors [13,47]. Customers tend to compare the price of the service provider of a particular type of service with prices of other providers offering the same service.…”
Section: Service Provider Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Customers may choose to pick certain providers' services based on their quality [13,14,20]. Berezny and Konecny [51] state that customers judge service quality based on the number of complaints received.…”
Section: Service Provider Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Customer loyalty evaluation is an important condition for the development of customer loyalty. A range of customer loyalty evaluation instruments has been developed by marketing scholars over the last few decades [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Instruments for the evaluation of customer loyalty can be classified as behavioral, attitudinal, and multidimensional [4][5][6][7][8].…”
This study sheds light on customer loyalty based on three groups of factors (customer, service provider, and environment). Noting the diversity of the effects of customer loyalty factors, this research investigates the impact of every factor upon customer loyalty. This paper provides an innovative insight into how a variety of customer loyalty factors might be combined into a single measure of customer loyalty. Finally, this study examines phases of customer loyalty and identifies the factors that prevent a peak of customer loyalty. The factors determining customer loyalty explain why customers move across different loyalty phases over time. The results of the empirical testing confirmed the practical applicability of the suggested approach for evaluating customer loyalty based on these factors. An innovative approach to the evaluation of customer loyalty is essential for marketers because it will help them to evaluate loyalty in cases where data about customer behavior are not collected. The findings of the research contribute to a better understanding of which factors are a viable basis for increasing customer loyalty, specifically in the catering and beauty markets, and offer guidance to marketing managers on how to shift customers to more desirable loyalty phases.
“…Over the last four decades, research on customer loyalty factors has been a prolific field. Marketing scholars [9,11,[13][14][15][16][18][19][20] have developed and validated more than one hundred different factors determining customer loyalty. Classifications of factors determining customer loyalty show that researchers' opinions on collections of factors vary.…”
“…Price is viewed as an important factor, especially for middle-income earners and/or in commodity-based sectors [13,47]. Customers tend to compare the price of the service provider of a particular type of service with prices of other providers offering the same service.…”
Section: Service Provider Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Customers may choose to pick certain providers' services based on their quality [13,14,20]. Berezny and Konecny [51] state that customers judge service quality based on the number of complaints received.…”
Section: Service Provider Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Customer loyalty evaluation is an important condition for the development of customer loyalty. A range of customer loyalty evaluation instruments has been developed by marketing scholars over the last few decades [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Instruments for the evaluation of customer loyalty can be classified as behavioral, attitudinal, and multidimensional [4][5][6][7][8].…”
This study sheds light on customer loyalty based on three groups of factors (customer, service provider, and environment). Noting the diversity of the effects of customer loyalty factors, this research investigates the impact of every factor upon customer loyalty. This paper provides an innovative insight into how a variety of customer loyalty factors might be combined into a single measure of customer loyalty. Finally, this study examines phases of customer loyalty and identifies the factors that prevent a peak of customer loyalty. The factors determining customer loyalty explain why customers move across different loyalty phases over time. The results of the empirical testing confirmed the practical applicability of the suggested approach for evaluating customer loyalty based on these factors. An innovative approach to the evaluation of customer loyalty is essential for marketers because it will help them to evaluate loyalty in cases where data about customer behavior are not collected. The findings of the research contribute to a better understanding of which factors are a viable basis for increasing customer loyalty, specifically in the catering and beauty markets, and offer guidance to marketing managers on how to shift customers to more desirable loyalty phases.
“…Prior research has indicated that in business markets, a brand can create price premium [73,75,76], especially when the brand has high brand awareness, perceived quality, and perceived prestige value. Thus, even though there is a price increase, consumer's responses towards the brand will stay the same or more elastic.…”
Although brand sustainability is found essential for brand survival, establishing it has remained challenging. Brand sustainability requires a strong association between brand equity and consumer values. The current study attempts to discover critical components involved that may influence Indonesian and Taiwanese consumers to purchase smartphones such as Apple and High-Tech Computer Corporation (HTC). Primary data collection was conducted to gather data through an online field survey. Following a quantitative approach, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine the link between research constructs and the proposed hypotheses based on two samples of 202 and 217 respondents in Taiwan and Indonesia, respectively. Results represent significant and non-significant direct influences underlining the significance of perceived quality and brand preferences when testing brand equity effects on how consumers value different brands. While price premium is found to be the most influential factor that shapes the formation of purchase intention for Apple brands among both Taiwanese and Indonesian consumers, perceived quality is also affecting Taiwanese brand preference for HTC. Furthermore, prestige value is revealed to be a predictor of brand preference among Indonesian HTC consumers. Research findings have important implications for decision-makers to motivate purchase intentions of smartphone users toward specific brands. The insights provided by the findings will assist marketers in developing brand strategies that influence Taiwanese and Indonesian consumers’ purchases of Apple or HTC products.
Pay-what-you-want (PWYW) and name-your-own-price (NYOP) participative pricing mechanisms are becoming more popular among firms. In response, researchers have examined separate outcomes for each mechanism. However, questions remain, especially regarding which mechanism is most beneficial for consumers and companies. Therefore, our main objective is to investigate the role of these participative pricing mechanisms on consumers' pricing satisfaction, pain of payment, and amount of money they intend to pay. We also explore perceived control as mediating the effect of pricing mechanism on pricing satisfaction and pain of payment. Results from two experimental studies indicate that consumers are more satisfied with the pricing mechanism and feel less pain of payment under PWYW offers rather than under NYOP offers, but they intend to pay less than they would have paid for NYOP. External reference prices (ERPs) act as a boundary condition. That is, in both PWYW and NYOP pricing conditions, when retailers use ERPs, consumers intend to pay more but they are less satisfied with pricing and feel more pain of payment. The article concludes with implications for retailers using participative pricing.
| INTRODUCTIONRetailers know that when consumers perceive that prices are reasonable, they are more satisfied with their purchases and form increased
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.