2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinacy of equilibrium outcome distributions for zero sum and common utility games

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWe show the generic finiteness of probability distributions induced on outcomes by the Nash equilibria in two player zero sum and common interest outcome games.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Govindan and McLennan (2001) proved that for games with two outcomes and any number of players the number of equilibrium distributions on outcomes is generically finite. Similar results have been obtained for two player, three outcomes games (González-Pimienta 2010), sender-receiver cheap-talk games (Park 1997), zero sum or common interest games (Govindan andMcLennan 1998, Litan andMarhuenda 2012) and games with three players and two strategies each (Litan, Marhuenda, and Sudhölter 2015).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Govindan and McLennan (2001) proved that for games with two outcomes and any number of players the number of equilibrium distributions on outcomes is generically finite. Similar results have been obtained for two player, three outcomes games (González-Pimienta 2010), sender-receiver cheap-talk games (Park 1997), zero sum or common interest games (Govindan andMcLennan 1998, Litan andMarhuenda 2012) and games with three players and two strategies each (Litan, Marhuenda, and Sudhölter 2015).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…We follow very closely the notation and set up adopted in Litan, Marhuenda, and Sudhölter (2015) and Litan and Marhuenda (2012). Let S 1 = {1, 2, .…”
Section: Outcome Game Forms With Two Playersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following is proved in Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4 of Litan and Marhuenda (2012). For V ⊂ R l a linear subspace and a ∈ R l we let aV = V a = {a · v : v ∈ V }.…”
Section: Outcome Game Forms With Two Playersmentioning
confidence: 99%