1981
DOI: 10.1139/x81-073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterioration of trembling aspen clones in the Great Lakes region

Abstract: In order to test the hypothesis that the deterioration of trembling aspen (Populustremuloides Michx.) is related to variations in climate, soil properties, and genotype, 59 trembling aspen clones were sampled in Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Ontario. A longevity index (LI) was calculated by taking the difference between predicted basal area from normal yield tables and measured basal area for each clone. Correlations of environmental variables with LI indicate that aspen longevity decreases with increasi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Early stand breakup for trembling aspen has been reported for the Great Lakes area (Fralish 1972, Shields andBockheim 1981). The reason for this breakup is increased mortality from white trunk rot and hypoxylon canker (Perala 1977).…”
Section: Trembling Aspen and Stand Breakupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early stand breakup for trembling aspen has been reported for the Great Lakes area (Fralish 1972, Shields andBockheim 1981). The reason for this breakup is increased mortality from white trunk rot and hypoxylon canker (Perala 1977).…”
Section: Trembling Aspen and Stand Breakupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, poor sites for trembling aspen are shallow to bedrock soils, gravelly morainal soils, coarse-textured sands and poorly-drained mineral and organic soils. On these poor sites aspen growth is slow, yields are small, defects and disease are common and "stand breakup" occurs at relatively young ages (Fralish 1972, Shields and Bockheim 1981, Perala 1991, Carmean 1996.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A forest that changes as it ages is not necessarily changing states; rather it may be considered to be undergoing compositional and structural change internal to the system without switching to an alternative state, e.g., when a forest changes into a grassland, tundra, or sphagnum bog. However, there are some circumstances when succession may give rise to an alternative and less desired state, such as when a forest undergoes gradual paludification to a bog-like state (Banner et al1983;Fenton et al 2005), or when a shade-intolerant deciduous stand senesces into a permanently shrub-dominated condition (Shields and Bockheim 1981;Nierenberg and Hibbs 2000). In essence, the role played by succession depends on how research questions or management issues are formulated, the time scales involved, and their relationship to relevant system states .…”
Section: Ecological Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les âges maximaux mesurés et estimés lors de la présente étude sont respectivement de 202 et 203 ans. Cette augmentation de la longévité du peuplier en situation marginale a déjà été mentionnée pour les populations de l'Alaska (ROE, 1965) et semble liée à une diminution de la température moyenne annuelle (SHIELDS et BOCKHEIM, 1981 ). La forme de croissance des peupliers de la sous-zone arbustive de la toundra forestière est généralement arbustive et la hauteur maximale atteinte dépend en grande partie du relief local ( fig.…”
Section: Resultats Le Développement Spatialunclassified