2004
DOI: 10.1002/ana.10812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterioration of naming nouns versus verbs in primary progressive aphasia

Abstract: Disproportionate impairment of naming nouns versus verbs and the opposite pattern have been reported in cases of focal brain damage or degenerative disease, indicating that processing of nouns and verbs may rely on different brain regions. However, it has not been clear whether it is the spoken word forms or the meanings (or both) of nouns and verbs that depend on separate neural regions. We tested oral and written naming of nouns and verbs, matched in difficulty, in patients with nonfluent primary progressive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
107
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
7
107
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies will also need to employ a broader, multimodal assessment of noun and verb processing. For example, the inclusion of both oral and written verb generation tasks might provide insights into the contributions of phonological versus orthographic processing to the verb-based semantic memory deficit in SCZ (e.g., Hillis, Oh, & Ken, 2004b). Similarly, the use of action and object naming (e.g., Kemmerer & Tranel, 2000) and concept recognition (Damasio et al, 2004) tests that are matched on item frequency and difficulty level are needed to determine the relative contributions of word search, retrieval and/or conceptual knowledge to the observed verb generation deficit in SCZ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies will also need to employ a broader, multimodal assessment of noun and verb processing. For example, the inclusion of both oral and written verb generation tasks might provide insights into the contributions of phonological versus orthographic processing to the verb-based semantic memory deficit in SCZ (e.g., Hillis, Oh, & Ken, 2004b). Similarly, the use of action and object naming (e.g., Kemmerer & Tranel, 2000) and concept recognition (Damasio et al, 2004) tests that are matched on item frequency and difficulty level are needed to determine the relative contributions of word search, retrieval and/or conceptual knowledge to the observed verb generation deficit in SCZ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral production of overlearned sequences such as counting and repetition of phrasesismore fluent than spontaneous speech. The ability to name orally and write a pictured object's nameto confrontation is performed relatively well,although there may be difficulty naming with verbs 39 . There is relatively good comprehension of single words presented orally and in writing, although there may be difficulty with verb comprehension 38 .…”
Section: Speech and Language Deficits In Nappamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hutchinson, 2003 ;Lucas, 2000). Des données récentes, essentiellement issues d'études neuropsychologiques (e.g., Berndt, Mitchum, Haendiges et Sandson, 1997 ;Bird, Howard et Franklin, 2000 ;Caramazza et Hillis, 1991 ;Hillis, Oh et Ken, 2004 ;Shapiro et Caramazza, 2003) et d'imagerie fonctionnelle (e.g., Grossman et al, 2002 ;Shapiro et al, 2005 ;Tranel, Martin, Damasio, Grabowski et Hichwa, 2005), semblent toutefois confirmer l'existence de représentations lexico-sémantiques distinctes pour les verbes et les noms, ou au moins de structures d'accès différentes pour les deux types de mots (voir Druks, 2002, pour une revue de question). D'autres chercheurs ont étudié l'acquisition des verbes et leur rôle diffé-rentiel dans le développement conceptuel et l'apprentissage du langage chez l'enfant (Imai, Haryu et Okada, 2005 ;Lidz et Gleitman, 2004 ;Tomasello, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified