2021
DOI: 10.4324/9781003203636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify the listener sensitivity to infant-directedness in speech and song, and to quantify their response biases, we computed the metrics of d ′ and c ( criterion ) over the stimuli. These quantities were calculated with standard techniques from signal detection theory 113 .…”
Section: Supplementary Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the listener sensitivity to infant-directedness in speech and song, and to quantify their response biases, we computed the metrics of d ′ and c ( criterion ) over the stimuli. These quantities were calculated with standard techniques from signal detection theory 113 .…”
Section: Supplementary Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We additionally derived d-prime (d′) and criterion (c) from signal detection theory [ 32 , 33 ] to examine discriminability of the targets and any bias in their responses, respectively. Specifically, the number of hits and false alarms for fearful faces were calculated for each participant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compute this null distribution, we sampled 50 runs of split groups (same number of repeats as the actual split groups) from the set of repeats for all stimulus sequences; in addition, the responses for each repeat were randomly flipped in time (i.e., reversed) or in sign, breaking any possible co-variation across time among repeats. For each combination of LC type and stimulus, we computed the sensitivity d I [68] between the actual R 2 distribution and the null R 2 distribution. We designated a threshold d I > 1 to indicate that an LC was responsive for a given stimulus sequence (i.e., we had a reliable estimate of the repeat-averaged response).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%