2015
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2014.0144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection performance analysis of recurrence quantification analysis measures for low observable target within sea clutter under different sea conditions

Abstract: An approach based on recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) measures is proposed to detect the low observable target within sea clutter in this study. Based on the criterion named the fixed amount of nearest neighbours, recurrence plots (RPs) are constructed. RQA measures are used to describe the line structures of the RPs. According to the differences between the RQA measures of sea clutter with and without a target, the low observable target within sea clutter can be detected. Four sea clutter datasets und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a full comparison, the proposed detector is employed to detect real-life sea-surface small floating targets existing in IPIX datasets. Many novel detection methods have been proposed to solve this type of problem [12,14,15,19]. Figure 5 illustrates the TD images of the detected target from primary cells of five datasets using the cICA-based detector with CCEBM.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of the Proposed Detector For Detection Of Real-life Sea-surface Floating Small Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For a full comparison, the proposed detector is employed to detect real-life sea-surface small floating targets existing in IPIX datasets. Many novel detection methods have been proposed to solve this type of problem [12,14,15,19]. Figure 5 illustrates the TD images of the detected target from primary cells of five datasets using the cICA-based detector with CCEBM.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of the Proposed Detector For Detection Of Real-life Sea-surface Floating Small Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the proposed detector's detection performance is approximately the same in high and low sea states, suggesting that it is a robust detector for different RCSs, SCRs, CNRs, and shape parameters. Proposed cICA-based detector with CCEBM Feature-based detector using three TF features [15] Tri-feature-based detector [14] Fractal-based detector [10], [11] Data label Adaptive composite GLRT detector [26] Data label Proposed cICA-based detector 3-D polarimetric-feature detector [20] Tri-feature-based detector at VH [14] Tri-feature-based detector at HV [14] Tri-feature-based detector at HH [14] Tri-feature-based detector at VV [14] (c) Figure 6: e probabilities of detection for all twenty datasets at VV polarization: (a) proposed detector, feature-based detector using three TF features [15], trifeature-based detector [14], and fractal-based detector [10,11]; (b) proposed detector, feature-compression-based detector [19], and adaptive composite GLRT detector [24]; (c) ROC curves for the proposed detector at VV polarization, 3D polarimetricfeature detector [19], and trifeature-based detector [14] at HH, HV, VH, and VV, while T � 512, T Ref � 0, and T CPI � 512. Mathematical Problems in Engineering…”
Section: Sample Size Dependency and Computational Time Of The Proposed Ccebm And Other Cica Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations