2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-015-2898-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection Orthogonality in Macromolecular Separations: Role of the On-Line Viscometer in Characterizing Polymers at Conditions of “Spectroscopic Invisibility”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All values were obtained by first-order fits of the data, without forcing through the origin. All Pearson’s r values were 0.997 or greater, except for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), for which the value was 0.798 due to the vanishingly low ∂ n /∂ c of PDMS at the given experimental conditions (so low, in fact, that PDMS can be considered to be “spectroscopically invisible” at these conditions [25]).…”
Section: Determining Mw By Off-line Batch-mode Malsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All values were obtained by first-order fits of the data, without forcing through the origin. All Pearson’s r values were 0.997 or greater, except for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), for which the value was 0.798 due to the vanishingly low ∂ n /∂ c of PDMS at the given experimental conditions (so low, in fact, that PDMS can be considered to be “spectroscopically invisible” at these conditions [25]).…”
Section: Determining Mw By Off-line Batch-mode Malsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuing investigations into detector orthogonalities begun in [5], the same group more recently examined both detector and wavelength orthogonalities [6]. SEC with online refractometry (DRI), UV/visible (UV) where the UV was a diode array detector, and fluorescence (FL) detection, of polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) blends demonstrated orthogonality of DRI and UV and, within the UV spectrum, wavelength orthogonality wherein one component of the blend was observable at one wavelength but not at another while the other blend component was observable at both wavelengths.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%