2012 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/wifs.2012.6412641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of video double encoding with GOP size estimation

Abstract: Video forensics is an emerging discipline, that aims at inferring information about the processing history undergone by a digital video in a blind fashion. In this work we introduce a new forensic footprint and, based on it, propose a method for detecting whether a video has been encoded twice; if this is the case, we also estimate the size of the Group Of Pictures (GOP) employed during the first encoding. As shown in the experiments, the footprint proves to be very robust even in realistic settings (i.e., whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 shows the Holm test results, where the proposed method is set as the control method, the null hypothesis (H0) is set so that there is no difference between the control method and the comparative method, and the Holm p-value refers to the adjusted p-value of the first combination of the ranking that performs significantly worse than one of the best groups. It can be seen in Table 5 that for Stamm et al [20] and Vazquez-Padin et al [21], the hypothesis H0 are both rejected, in other words, the proposed method is apparently better than [20,21]. However, for He et al [22], the hypothesis H0 is accepted, that is, the proposed method is slightly better than [22] in terms of performance, but it is not improved significantly from a statistical point of view.…”
Section: Detection Results For the Double Compressionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Table 5 shows the Holm test results, where the proposed method is set as the control method, the null hypothesis (H0) is set so that there is no difference between the control method and the comparative method, and the Holm p-value refers to the adjusted p-value of the first combination of the ranking that performs significantly worse than one of the best groups. It can be seen in Table 5 that for Stamm et al [20] and Vazquez-Padin et al [21], the hypothesis H0 are both rejected, in other words, the proposed method is apparently better than [20,21]. However, for He et al [22], the hypothesis H0 is accepted, that is, the proposed method is slightly better than [22] in terms of performance, but it is not improved significantly from a statistical point of view.…”
Section: Detection Results For the Double Compressionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Figure 8 illustrates that, by using the enhanced feature of the string of the data bits, the interference of frame 75 has been partially suppressed and the periodicity for all peak values is detected. We also prepare the proposed method with other state-of-the-art methods, including He et al [22], Stamm et al [20] and Vazquez-Padin et al [21].…”
Section: Detection Results For the Double Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations