2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00254-007-0733-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of underground cavities by combining gravity, magnetic and ground penetrating radar surveys: a case study from the Zaragoza area, NE Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This filling contains ferromagnetic elements, showing higher values of magnetic susceptibility than local natural materials. The presence of urban debris at surface overlying previous historical collapses confirms this interpretation (see for example Mochales et al, 2008).…”
Section: Integrated Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This filling contains ferromagnetic elements, showing higher values of magnetic susceptibility than local natural materials. The presence of urban debris at surface overlying previous historical collapses confirms this interpretation (see for example Mochales et al, 2008).…”
Section: Integrated Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In scientific literature, many papers report on the successful application of geophysical prospecting for the detection of natural cavities: Gibson et al (2004), Leucci et al (2004), Mochales et al (2008), Kaufmann et al (2011), Gambetta et al (2011), Gó mez-Ortiz and Martín-Crespo (2012) and Pueyo Anchuela et al (2013). This is probably because natural cavities are often isolated, with a high contrast between their physical parameters and those of the host material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea behind most of these geophysical methods is a material property of the void that is significantly different from the surrounding host rock and thus makes a material contrast. This material contrast can then be detected using a specific geophysical technique (e.g., Butler, 1984;Gibson et al, 2004;El-Qady et al, 2005;Dobecki and Upchurch, 2006;Nyquist et al, 2007;Mochales et al, 2008;Margiotta et al, 2012;Putiška et al, 2012a). Among some of the most frequently used geophysical techniques, electrical-resistivity tomography and microgravity can be mentioned, but additional methods can provide very useful information as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%