Abstract:An unbalanced bid can be defined as a bid price that does not accurately reflect reasonable cost, contractor's profit, general overhead cost and other indirect costs. Selecting an unbalanced bidder as the contractor may lead to significant increases in the contract price. Therefore, detecting the unbalanced bids is a critical issue for owners. There are two main types of unbalanced bid, which consists of front-end loaded and quantity error exploitation. This study mainly focuses on the second type, namely quan… Show more
“…The main aim of this study is to propose an improved version of the unbalanced bid detection model developed by Polat et al (2018). The proposed model uses eight different grading systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polat et al, (2018) described the existing grading systems for detection of unbalanced bids. The modified approach proposed in this study adopts the same grading systems used by Polat et al, (2018), but the following grading systems are added for detection of unbalanced bids.…”
Section: The Improved Unbalanced Bid Detection Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study focused on the detection of unbalanced bids created by quantity error exploitation in unit price contracts. For this purpose, after reviewing the existing models in the literature, an advanced unbalanced bid detection model was proposed by improving the model developed by Polat et al, (2018) [10]. The proposed model uses eight different grading systems in detection of unbalanced bids, whereas the previous model consisted of five grading systems.…”
Detection of unbalanced bids is crucial for owners because selecting an unbalanced bidder as the contractor may bring about cost overruns. There are two main types of unbalanced bids, namely, mathematically and materially unbalanced bid. This study mainly focuses on the second type, where a contractor tends to increase the unit prices of items whose quantity was somehow underrated by the owner's team. This study proposes a modification to a model that was developed to assist owners in detecting unbalanced bids. The major difference between the proposed model and the previous one lies in the grading system of detecting the unbalanced bids. In the proposed model, eight different grading systems are used in detection of unbalanced bids, whereas the previous model consisted of five grading systems. The final score of each bidder is calculated by assigning weights to these grading systems. Bidders are evaluated not only according to the offered bid prices, but also according to the calculated final scores. The applicability of the proposed approach is presented along with an illustrative example. It was observed that the proposed model detected the unbalanced bid, which attains the lowest final score. The proposed model represents a marked improvement on existing practice and provides owners with a new perspective in detecting unbalanced bids. Armed with such a tool, it may be easier for owners to protect themselves from the risk of unbalanced bids.
“…The main aim of this study is to propose an improved version of the unbalanced bid detection model developed by Polat et al (2018). The proposed model uses eight different grading systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polat et al, (2018) described the existing grading systems for detection of unbalanced bids. The modified approach proposed in this study adopts the same grading systems used by Polat et al, (2018), but the following grading systems are added for detection of unbalanced bids.…”
Section: The Improved Unbalanced Bid Detection Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study focused on the detection of unbalanced bids created by quantity error exploitation in unit price contracts. For this purpose, after reviewing the existing models in the literature, an advanced unbalanced bid detection model was proposed by improving the model developed by Polat et al, (2018) [10]. The proposed model uses eight different grading systems in detection of unbalanced bids, whereas the previous model consisted of five grading systems.…”
Detection of unbalanced bids is crucial for owners because selecting an unbalanced bidder as the contractor may bring about cost overruns. There are two main types of unbalanced bids, namely, mathematically and materially unbalanced bid. This study mainly focuses on the second type, where a contractor tends to increase the unit prices of items whose quantity was somehow underrated by the owner's team. This study proposes a modification to a model that was developed to assist owners in detecting unbalanced bids. The major difference between the proposed model and the previous one lies in the grading system of detecting the unbalanced bids. In the proposed model, eight different grading systems are used in detection of unbalanced bids, whereas the previous model consisted of five grading systems. The final score of each bidder is calculated by assigning weights to these grading systems. Bidders are evaluated not only according to the offered bid prices, but also according to the calculated final scores. The applicability of the proposed approach is presented along with an illustrative example. It was observed that the proposed model detected the unbalanced bid, which attains the lowest final score. The proposed model represents a marked improvement on existing practice and provides owners with a new perspective in detecting unbalanced bids. Armed with such a tool, it may be easier for owners to protect themselves from the risk of unbalanced bids.
“…Unascertained mathematics (An et al, 2018) and fuzzy logic (Su et al, 2020a) were used to measure the degree of unbalanced for every unit price. Polat et al (2018Polat et al ( , 2019 proposed an unbalanced bid detection model, including eight grading systems. In this system, the owners may assign weights to each grading system according to the characteristics of their projects.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Unbalanced Biddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2020a) were used to measure the degree of unbalanced for every unit price. Polat et al. (2018, 2019) proposed an unbalanced bid detection model, including eight grading systems.…”
PurposeUnbalanced bidding can seriously imposed the government from obtaining the best value for the taxpayers' money in public procurement since it increases the owner's cost and decreases the fairness of the competitive bidding process. How to detect an unbalanced bid is a challenging task faced by theoretical researchers and practical actors. This study aims to develop an identification method of unbalanced bidding in the construction industry.Design/methodology/approachThe identification of unbalanced bidding is considered as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. A data-driven unit price database from the historical bidding document is built to present the reference unit prices as benchmarks. According to the proposed extended TOPSIS method, the data-driven unit price is chosen as the positive ideal solution, and the unit price that has the furthest absolute distance measure as the negative ideal solution. The concept of relative distance is introduced to measure the distances between positive and negative ideal solutions and each bidding unit price. The unbalanced bidding degree is ranked by means of relative distance.FindingsThe proposed model can be used for the quantitative evaluation of unbalanced bidding from a decision-making perspective. The identification process is developed according to the decision-making process. The finding shows that the model will support owners to efficiently and effectively identify unbalanced bidding in the bid evaluation stage.Originality/valueThe data-driven reference unit prices improve the accuracy of the benchmark to evaluate the unbalanced bidding. The extended TOPSIS model is applied to identify unbalanced bidding; the owners can undertake objective decision-making to identify and prevent unbalanced bidding at the stage of procurement.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.