2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06593.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Tumor Genetic Alterations of Bladder Carcinomas in Body Fluids Depends on Sample Treatment before DNA Isolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasma (contained EDTA), serum, and urine samples were collected preoperatively and stored frozen at −80°C, as well as tissue samples. After defrosting, body fluid samples were centrifuged at 15,000 g for 30 min 11. For DNA analysis, we used the supernatants only.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma (contained EDTA), serum, and urine samples were collected preoperatively and stored frozen at −80°C, as well as tissue samples. After defrosting, body fluid samples were centrifuged at 15,000 g for 30 min 11. For DNA analysis, we used the supernatants only.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the authors demonstrated that the examination of urine (from the paper it is not clear whether the cellular sediment or cell-free urine supernatant was used) is better suited than serum (52 LOH + MA in urine vs. 23 LOH + MA in serum). That the analysis of cell-free urine is better suited for microsatellite alterations than urine sediments was shown by several groups and the reason for this difference might be a "contamination" of the sediment with normal epithelial cells leading to a high noise vs. signal ratio [189,190]. The total amount of cell-free DNA and the relative quantity of long DNA (measured as 400 bp amplicons in q PCR) in urine supernatant is seen as a potential biomarker for bladder cancer [191].…”
Section: Cfnas In Stool and Urine (See Also Sect 4)mentioning
confidence: 98%