Detection of Tuberculosis Recurrence, Diagnosis and Treatment Response by a Blood Transcriptomic Risk Signature in HIV-Infected Persons on Antiretroviral Therapy
Abstract:HIV-infected individuals are at high risk of tuberculosis disease and those with prior tuberculosis episodes are at even higher risk of disease recurrence. A non-sputum biomarker that identifies individuals at highest tuberculosis risk would allow targeted microbiological testing and appropriate treatment and also guide need for prolonged therapy. We determined the utility of a previously developed whole blood transcriptomic correlate of risk (COR) signature for (1) predicting incident recurrent tuberculosis, … Show more
“…Previously identified genes that can discriminate TB patient from non-TB patients and TB risk 11,13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] either do not fill the minimum sensitivity requirements in adults regardless of HIV status for a POC test (95% in smearpositive culture-confirmed cases and 60-80% in smear-negative culture-confirmed cases), or they proposed gene www.nature.com/scientificreports/ signatures-based tests which are very difficult to implement. Here, although the number of participants was a limiting issue, we identified single candidate genes for TB diagnosis and progression, all of them presenting high levels of AUC, sensitivity, and specificity.…”
Current diagnostic tests for tuberculosis (TB) are not able to predict reactivation disease progression from latent TB infection (LTBI). The main barrier to predicting reactivation disease is the lack of our understanding of host biomarkers associated with progression from latent infection to active disease. Here, we applied an immune-based gene expression profile by NanoString platform to identify whole blood markers that can distinguish active TB from other lung diseases (OPD), and that could be further evaluated as a reactivation TB predictor. Among 23 candidate genes that differentiated patients with active TB from those with OPD, nine genes (CD274, CEACAM1, CR1, FCGR1A/B, IFITM1, IRAK3, LILRA6, MAPK14, PDCD1LG2) demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Seven genes (C1QB, C2, CCR2, CCRL2, LILRB4, MAPK14, MSR1) distinguished TB from LTBI with sensitivity and specificity between 82 and 100%. This study identified single gene candidates that distinguished TB from OPD and LTBI with high sensitivity and specificity (both > 82%), which may be further evaluated as diagnostic for disease and as predictive markers for reactivation TB.
“…Previously identified genes that can discriminate TB patient from non-TB patients and TB risk 11,13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] either do not fill the minimum sensitivity requirements in adults regardless of HIV status for a POC test (95% in smearpositive culture-confirmed cases and 60-80% in smear-negative culture-confirmed cases), or they proposed gene www.nature.com/scientificreports/ signatures-based tests which are very difficult to implement. Here, although the number of participants was a limiting issue, we identified single candidate genes for TB diagnosis and progression, all of them presenting high levels of AUC, sensitivity, and specificity.…”
Current diagnostic tests for tuberculosis (TB) are not able to predict reactivation disease progression from latent TB infection (LTBI). The main barrier to predicting reactivation disease is the lack of our understanding of host biomarkers associated with progression from latent infection to active disease. Here, we applied an immune-based gene expression profile by NanoString platform to identify whole blood markers that can distinguish active TB from other lung diseases (OPD), and that could be further evaluated as a reactivation TB predictor. Among 23 candidate genes that differentiated patients with active TB from those with OPD, nine genes (CD274, CEACAM1, CR1, FCGR1A/B, IFITM1, IRAK3, LILRA6, MAPK14, PDCD1LG2) demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Seven genes (C1QB, C2, CCR2, CCRL2, LILRB4, MAPK14, MSR1) distinguished TB from LTBI with sensitivity and specificity between 82 and 100%. This study identified single gene candidates that distinguished TB from OPD and LTBI with high sensitivity and specificity (both > 82%), which may be further evaluated as diagnostic for disease and as predictive markers for reactivation TB.
“…Modern imaging techniques such as PET-CT scans may correlate with treatment responses, but alone were not accurate enough to precisely identify patients with recurrent disease in South Africa ( 96 ). Interestingly, certain RNA signatures could predict recurrent disease in tuberculosis patients ( 97 , 98 ). However, these biomarkers have not been prospectively evaluated and markers that could individualize the duration of therapy are missing so far.…”
Section: Subsections Relevant For the Subjectmentioning
Tuberculosis is a bacterial infectious disease that is mainly transmitted from human to human via infectious aerosols. Currently, tuberculosis is the leading cause of death by an infectious disease worldwide. In the past decade, the number of patients affected by tuberculosis has increased by ∼20 percent and the emergence of drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenges the goal of elimination of tuberculosis in the near future. For the last 50 years, management of patients with tuberculosis has followed a standardized management approach. This standardization neglects the variation in human susceptibility to infection, immune response, the pharmacokinetics of drugs, and the individual duration of treatment needed to achieve relapse-free cure. Here we propose a package of precision medicine-guided therapies that has the prospect to drive clinical management decisions, based on both host immunity and M. tuberculosis strains genetics. Recently, important scientific discoveries and technological advances have been achieved that provide a perspective for individualized rather than standardized management of patients with tuberculosis. For the individual selection of best medicines and host-directed therapies, personalized drug dosing, and treatment durations, physicians treating patients with tuberculosis will be able to rely on these advances in systems biology and to apply them at the bedside.
“…(C) Expression of the 3 genes from Sweeney3 17 in the Null and TB Ag conditions on visit 2 post-treatment. (D) RISK11 score 66 in the Null and TB Ag conditions, pre and post-treatment, for the LTBI and TB groups, calculated using the Singscore method. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for discrimination of LTBI/TB groups using the RISK11 score for the Null and TB Ag conditions on visit 1 pre-treatment (Pre-Tx) (E) and visit 2 after successful antibiotic treatment (Post-Tx) (F) .…”
SUMMARYTuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health problem with host-directed therapeutics offering potential as novel treatment strategies. However, their successful development still requires a comprehensive understanding of howMycobacterium tuberculosis(M.tb) infection impacts immune responses. To address this challenge, we applied standardised immunomonitoring tools to compare TB antigen, BCG and IL-1β induced immune responses between individuals with latentM.tbinfection (LTBI) and active TB disease, at diagnosis and after cure. This revealed distinct responses between TB and LTBI groups at transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic levels. At baseline, we identified pregnane steroids and the PPARγ pathway as new immune-metabolic drivers of elevated plasma IL-1ra in TB. We also observed dysregulated induced IL-1 responses after BCG stimulation in TB patients. Elevated IL-1 antagonist responses were explained by upstream differences in TNF responses, while for IL-1 agonists it was due to downstream differences in granzyme mediated cleavage. Finally, the immune response to IL-1β driven signalling was also dramatically perturbed in TB disease but was completely restored after successful antibiotic treatment. This systems immunology approach improves our knowledge of how immune responses are altered during TB disease, and may support design of improved diagnostic, prophylactic and therapeutic tools.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.