2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.101.245117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of topological materials with machine learning

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that while generation of a suitable data set-and, to a lesser extent, network training (taking ∼3 min for fixed hyper-parameters on an Nvidia 1080 Ti GPU)-requires substantial computing resources, once trained, a neural network can predict band structures orders of magnitude faster than conventional theory-driven simulations (network evaluation of a single input takes ≈ 0.02 s on an Nvidia 1080 Ti GPU). While these gains are not sufficiently attractive to merit the training of regression networks for one-or few-off calculations, they can be relevant in inverse-design problems [26,27] or highthroughput searches [53], where a very large number of distinct system configurations must be considered.…”
Section: Band Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that while generation of a suitable data set-and, to a lesser extent, network training (taking ∼3 min for fixed hyper-parameters on an Nvidia 1080 Ti GPU)-requires substantial computing resources, once trained, a neural network can predict band structures orders of magnitude faster than conventional theory-driven simulations (network evaluation of a single input takes ≈ 0.02 s on an Nvidia 1080 Ti GPU). While these gains are not sufficiently attractive to merit the training of regression networks for one-or few-off calculations, they can be relevant in inverse-design problems [26,27] or highthroughput searches [53], where a very large number of distinct system configurations must be considered.…”
Section: Band Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we extracted the 585 unit cells with Δω 12 /ω 12 ≥ 5% from the data set for use as training data. We tested three different GAN-variants [58]: a conventional GAN [53], a least squares GAN (LSGAN) [59], and Deep Regret Analytic GAN (DRAGAN) [60], each distinguished essentially by their respective generator and discriminator cost functions [61]. In each case, we adapted standard off-the-shelf implementations [62] to take a single-channel, 64 × 64 pixelized ε(r) profile as training data.…”
Section: Generative Adversarial Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5E ) may appear and where the magnetization direction can tune the band topology ( 45 ). These filters greatly simplify the screening, but recent work suggests that more than 30% of nonmagnetic ( 3 , 46 ) and magnetic ( 10 ) materials exhibit nontrivial topology, so there are almost certainly many more MTQMs to uncover in the TMO dataset than we have considered here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). A very recent work constructed a gradient boosting model (a particular type of powerful supervised learning algorithm) that can predict the topology of a given known material based only on "coarse-grained" chemical composition and crystal symmetry predictors with an accuracy of 90% 74 . Similar to superconductivity, such models can be used to accelerate the search for novel materials by providing fast and efficient means to predict the possible topological nature of a given candidate.…”
Section: Ai For Computational Quantum Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%