2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.01.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of thiourea from electrorefining baths using silver nanoparticles-based sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen from Fig. 5A, the fluorescence recovery correlated well with the thiourea concentration range of 0.05-3.0 μM (R 2 = 0.990) with a linear detection limit of 10 nM, which was much lower than or comparable to those in the previously reported methods, 1,2,4,6,7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][34][35][36][42][43][44][45] and also nearly 100 times lower than the permitted value in the environment, indicating a rather high sensitivity.…”
Section: Colorimetric and Fluorescence Detection Of Thioureasupporting
confidence: 57%
“…As can be seen from Fig. 5A, the fluorescence recovery correlated well with the thiourea concentration range of 0.05-3.0 μM (R 2 = 0.990) with a linear detection limit of 10 nM, which was much lower than or comparable to those in the previously reported methods, 1,2,4,6,7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][34][35][36][42][43][44][45] and also nearly 100 times lower than the permitted value in the environment, indicating a rather high sensitivity.…”
Section: Colorimetric and Fluorescence Detection Of Thioureasupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Moreover, the iridium (III) complex has been used to detect TU in the living cell [15]. Using Ag/Cu nanoparticles, TU has been quantified analytically on an electronic refining bath [16]. Besides, the electrochemical I-V approach has been applied in the development of TU sensors based on Co 3 O 4 /MnO 2 nanoparticles [17] and SnO 2 /V 2 O 5 nanomaterials (NMs) [18] on GCEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many conventional analytical techniques for detection and analysis of Hg 2+ and TU, for example, atomic absorption spectrometry, [23,24] inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, [25,26] chemiluminescence, [27] cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry, [28][29][30] fluorescence detection, [31] supramolecular polymer networks [32,33] for Hg 2+ analysis, and UV-VIS, [34][35][36] mass spectrometry, [37,38] Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, [39] Raman spectroscopy, [40] high-performance liquid chromatography, [41] and electrochemical methods [42][43][44][45] for TU measurements. All of the methods described above for analysis of two species have some shortcomings, for example, they need time-consuming pretreatments, sophisticated operations, complicated detection processes, and relatively expensive instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%