2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2006.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of the toxin domoic acid from clam extracts using a portable surface plasmon resonance biosensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The curve midpoint value is low (17.9 ng/ml) and similar to those produced by Le Berre and Kane, (2006), Micheli et al, (2004), Stevens et al, (2007) and Yu et al, 2005) who showed midpoints of approximately 20 ng/ml using either optical or electrochemical biosensors. The curve is more sensitive than those produced by Kreuzer et al, (2002) (midpoint 42 ng/ml) and Lotierzo et al, (2004) (midpoint 58 ng/ml), however it is not as sensitive as that produced by Campbell et al, (2011) (midpoint 2.6ng/ml) using a fully automated prototype multichannel array surface plasmon resonance biosensor.…”
Section: Development Of a Domoic Acid Calibration Curvesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The curve midpoint value is low (17.9 ng/ml) and similar to those produced by Le Berre and Kane, (2006), Micheli et al, (2004), Stevens et al, (2007) and Yu et al, 2005) who showed midpoints of approximately 20 ng/ml using either optical or electrochemical biosensors. The curve is more sensitive than those produced by Kreuzer et al, (2002) (midpoint 42 ng/ml) and Lotierzo et al, (2004) (midpoint 58 ng/ml), however it is not as sensitive as that produced by Campbell et al, (2011) (midpoint 2.6ng/ml) using a fully automated prototype multichannel array surface plasmon resonance biosensor.…”
Section: Development Of a Domoic Acid Calibration Curvesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Antibody-based assays have been developed for a variety of HAB toxins and many of these tests are now commercially available (Laycock et al, 2001;Cembella et al, 2003). One novel immunoassay utilizes surface plasmon resonance (SPR) in a portable system developed for rapid field quantification of toxin levels in both shellfish and seawater (Stevens et al, 2007).…”
Section: Detection Of Marine Toxicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This portable device was able to reach a detection limit of 3 µg/L (10 nM) and quantifiable range of 4-60 µg/L (13-200 nM) for DA. The method correlates well with the detection of DA in concentrated algal extracts or high dissolved levels in seawater [96].…”
Section: Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 66%