2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of the tidal deformation of WASP-103b at 3 σ with CHEOPS

Abstract: Context. Ultra-short period planets undergo strong tidal interactions with their host star which lead to planet deformation and orbital tidal decay. Aims. WASP-103b is the exoplanet with the highest expected deformation signature in its transit light curve and one of the shortest expected spiral-in times. Measuring the tidal deformation of the planet would allow us to estimate the second degree fluid Love number and gain insight into the planet’s internal structure. Moreover, measuring the tidal decay timescal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…K2-139 is fainter than all of the targets studied by Borsato et al (2021), and none of our transits has good coverage of both ingress and egress, which is needed for the most-precise transit times. Good coverage of both ingress and egress would lead to transit times with a precision of around 30-60 s, as measured with CHEOPS for WASP-103 (Barros et al 2022), which is slightly fainter than K2-139.…”
Section: Transit Timingmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…K2-139 is fainter than all of the targets studied by Borsato et al (2021), and none of our transits has good coverage of both ingress and egress, which is needed for the most-precise transit times. Good coverage of both ingress and egress would lead to transit times with a precision of around 30-60 s, as measured with CHEOPS for WASP-103 (Barros et al 2022), which is slightly fainter than K2-139.…”
Section: Transit Timingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…CHEOPS (Benz et al 2021) is a small (0.32 m diameter) telescope designed for high-precision monoband photometry of individual exoplanetary systems. CHEOPS was launched in 2019 December, and science operations commenced in 2020 April, with several studies (e.g., Lendl et al 2020;Barros et al 2022) already published reporting results from the mission. We observed four transits of K2-139 b with CHEOPS, under the Guest Observers' program AO-1-005 (PI: Smith).…”
Section: Cheops Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find also that for most planets, even those with shorter orbital periods, measured uncertainties are currently too large to be affected by such deviations, however we identify a sample of planets whose uncer-tainties may be as much as four times smaller than the potential change caused by shape distortions. One such planet, WASP-103 b, was recently found to show tentative tidal deformations using multiple transit observations (Barros et al 2022), where it is reported that the volumetric radius of a fit derived using an ellipsoidal planet model is 5-6% larger than the radius derived from a spherical planet model. This further strengthens the notion that for such planets susceptible to tidal deformation, any attempts to characterise their interior composition based on their density derived using spherical planet models are likely to be under-estimating their errors, and that there is a wall of accuracy which is limited by a lack of knowledge of their true shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find also that for most planets, even those with shorter orbital periods, measured uncertainties are currently too large to be affected by such deviations; however, we identify a sample of planets whose uncertainties may be as much as 4× smaller than the potential change caused by shape distortions. One such planet, WASP-103 b, was recently found to show tentative tidal deformations using multiple transit observations (Barros et al 2022), where it is reported that the volumetric radius of a fit derived using an ellipsoidal planet model is 5%-6% larger than the radius derived from a spherical planet model. This further strengthens the notion that for such planets susceptible to tidal deformation, any attempts to characterize their interior composition based on their density derived using spherical planet models are likely to be under-estimating their errors and that there is a wall of accuracy, which is limited by a lack of knowledge of their true shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%