1969
DOI: 10.1136/sti.45.4.332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of T. vaginalis in women. Comparison of "wet smear" results with those of two cervical cytological methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the cervical smear for cytology detected more cases than any other method may have been due, at least in part, to the fact that this was the first cervical specimen to be taken. However, cytology smears have been reported by Thin and co-workers (7) to be as sensitive as direct microscopy on vaginal secretions for diagnosing trichomoniasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the cervical smear for cytology detected more cases than any other method may have been due, at least in part, to the fact that this was the first cervical specimen to be taken. However, cytology smears have been reported by Thin and co-workers (7) to be as sensitive as direct microscopy on vaginal secretions for diagnosing trichomoniasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus Woodcock (1972) stated that cultural methods were not substantially more reliable or more sensitive than simple microscopy, an opinion shared by Morton (1972), Jones (1972), andCampbell (1972). Thin, Melcher, Tapp, Nicol, and Hill (1969) found that cultures and direct microscopy gave similar results. Hoffman, Kilczewski, and Malysko (1961), using a different culture medium from any of the above, found 17 6 per cent.…”
Section: Cultural Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%