1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(96)00038-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of symmetry and perceptual organization: The way a lock-and-key process works

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
85
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
11
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has often been observed (at least as far back as Mach; see Baylis & Driver, 1994 that humans are more sensitive to symmetry within a pattern than to repetition. This observation has been confirmed in many experiments (e.g., Bertamini, Friedenberg, & Kubovy, 1997;Bruce & Morgan, 1975;Corballis & Roldan, 1974;Friedenberg & Bertamini, 2000). More recently, Baylis and Driver (1994) have argued that whereas symmetry within a shape can be detected in parallel, repetition seems to involve a serial process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…It has often been observed (at least as far back as Mach; see Baylis & Driver, 1994 that humans are more sensitive to symmetry within a pattern than to repetition. This observation has been confirmed in many experiments (e.g., Bertamini, Friedenberg, & Kubovy, 1997;Bruce & Morgan, 1975;Corballis & Roldan, 1974;Friedenberg & Bertamini, 2000). More recently, Baylis and Driver (1994) have argued that whereas symmetry within a shape can be detected in parallel, repetition seems to involve a serial process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For example, Makin, Wilton, Pecchinenda and Bertamini [45] used abstract stimuli similar to those used by Jacobsen and Höfel [47] (Figure 1), while Makin, Rampone, Pecchinenda and Bertamini [50] elicited the SPN with dot patterns (Figure 2). Rampone, Makin and Bertamini [51] recorded it with square field stimuli similar to those used by Royer [52], and Makin, Rampone, Wright, Martinovic and Bertamini [53] found it with line drawings (similar to those used in [54]). The latency of SPN onset varies from study to study, and different authors have used slightly different windows for analysis (different band-pass filtering of the EEG signal may also affect the apparent time course of the SPN).…”
Section: Question One: Is There An Automatic and Sustained Response Tmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, symmetry in dot patterns is easier to detect when the two elements of each symmetry pair are in the same depth plane than when they are spread across two different depth planes [38]. Correspondingly, symmetric contours are easier to detect when they belong to the same object than when they belong to two different objects [39][40][41]. This effect cannot be ascribed to attentional effects alone (two objects require divided attention), because the opposite result was found for repetition, that is, the detection of repetition is easier in two objects than in one object.…”
Section: Object Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%