2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of subtype blood cells using deep learning

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hand-crafted cell nuclei boundary masks are also used as shape prior to filter the detection of CNNs [20]. Others applied CNNs for cell detection with pixel-level classification for each patch in the images [21]- [23]. Hofener et.…”
Section: B Deep Cell Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hand-crafted cell nuclei boundary masks are also used as shape prior to filter the detection of CNNs [20]. Others applied CNNs for cell detection with pixel-level classification for each patch in the images [21]- [23]. Hofener et.…”
Section: B Deep Cell Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to classic ML algorithms, CNN showed better results in terms of precision of identification of four types of WBCs, including eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes. The precision was as high as 93% when the detection was limited to mononuclear cells versus polynuclear cells, and dropped to 88% when the four classes are considered [29]. However, to be suitable for real-time object detection, the ML software should be able to identify normal and abnormal leukocytes at a fast pace.…”
Section: Digital Microscopy For the Identification Of Normal And Abnomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors (Shahin et al, 2019), who also use CNNs to classify rather than detect the five base leukocytes, show results that exceed the classical approach (accuracy: 96%), so it can be deduced that the separation between detection and classification is beneficial for the problem-solving. Most methods using CNNs require leukocytes to be already segmented/detected (Shahin et al, 2019;Choi et al, 2017;Jiang et al, 2018;Qin et al, 2018;Rehman et al, 2018 andTiwari et al, 2018). In this context, there are various approaches to CNNs: (e.g.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%