2002
DOI: 10.1039/b200757f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of streptomycin and dihydrostreptomycin residues in milk, honey and meat samples using an optical biosensor

Abstract: Immuno-biosensor inhibition assays for the detection of streptomycin and dihydrostreptomycin residues in whole cows' milk, honey, pig kidney and pig muscle are reported. The antibody showed high cross-reactivity with dihydrostreptomycin in various foodstuffs (buffer 103%, milk 96%, honey 84%, kidney extract 129% and muscle extract 98%). There was no significant cross-reaction with other aminoglycosides or commonly used antibiotics. A streptomycin derivative was used to prepare a stable, reusable sensor chip su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] This labelfree, automated analysis technique combines the high affinity of biochemical interactions with low limits of detection producing rapid and reliable results. Minimal amounts of analyte are required to produce the chip surfaces, and these surfaces can be reused many times without loss of activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] This labelfree, automated analysis technique combines the high affinity of biochemical interactions with low limits of detection producing rapid and reliable results. Minimal amounts of analyte are required to produce the chip surfaces, and these surfaces can be reused many times without loss of activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They produce rapid and reliable results with minimal sample preparation and use of analyte (Elliott et al, 1999;Gaudin et al, 2001;Gustavsson et al, 2002;Haasnoot et al, 2002;Mello and Kubota, 2002;Samsonova et al, 2002;Ferguson et al, 2002Ferguson et al, , 2005Gaudin et al, 2005;Traynor et al, 2006;Mauriz et al, 2006;Llamas et al, 2007;Campbell et al, 2007;Connolly et al, 2007, Campas et al, 2007. This technology allows for real time, automated analysis combining the high affinity of biochemical interactions with low limits of detection and is characterised by its simplicity of use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1993, it was reported about obtaining the antibodies to protein conjugates of SM modified by carboxymethyloxime for aldehyde group (3,4,8,12,13). Later, this was performed using the reaction of SM with glutaraldehyde and carbodiimide condensation (9), binding of methylamino group with cyanuric chloride (11,14), and modification of SM by adipic acid dihydrazide (6,7,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modern practice, the control of SM residues in animal products is often based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This method was implemented in several countries in the form of test systems of various types including biosensor technology (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Russian researchers also have proposed a test system based on direct ELISA and the evaluation test using immunochromatography for the control of SM in milk and dairy products (13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%