1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jim.2900677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Sphingomonas spp in soil by PCR and sphingolipid biomarker analysis

Abstract: Sphingomonas spp possess unique abilities to degrade refractory contaminants and are found ubiquitously in the environment. We developed Sphingomonas genus-specific PCR primers (SPf-190 and SPr1-852) which showed specific amplification of a 627-bp 16S rDNA fragment from Sphingomonas spp. A PCR assay using these Sphingomonas specific primers was developed to detect Sphingomonas aromaticivorans B0695R in three texturally distinct soil types, showing detection limits between 1.3-2.2 × 10 3 CFU g −1 dry soil. A sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethylbenzene was found to be degraded by a pure culture of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia T3-c (Lee et al, 2002). On the other hand, the genus Sphingomonas has been receiving a lot of attention due to its diverse metabolic capability, with many isolated members reported to possess broad catabolic capabilities towards recalcitrant organic pollutants including single-ring aromatic and polyaromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated biphenyls, polychlorophenol, and halogenated diphenyl ethers; although limited literature is currently available on its direct use in biofilters (Fredrickson et al, 1995;Gabriel et al, 2005;Kim and Zylstra, 1999;Leung et al, 1999;Leys et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ethylbenzene was found to be degraded by a pure culture of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia T3-c (Lee et al, 2002). On the other hand, the genus Sphingomonas has been receiving a lot of attention due to its diverse metabolic capability, with many isolated members reported to possess broad catabolic capabilities towards recalcitrant organic pollutants including single-ring aromatic and polyaromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated biphenyls, polychlorophenol, and halogenated diphenyl ethers; although limited literature is currently available on its direct use in biofilters (Fredrickson et al, 1995;Gabriel et al, 2005;Kim and Zylstra, 1999;Leung et al, 1999;Leys et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To our knowledge, two degenerate Sphingomonas genus-specific PCR primers (Leung et al 1999) have been designed for Sphingomonas identification, but they were improper to directly analyze the diversity of Sphingomonas species because they could not cover the total Sphingomonas genus. One nondegenerate Sphingomonas genus-specific primer set (Leys et al 2004) was not able to exclude the detection of other Sphingomonadaceae genera, and another non-degenerate Sphingomonas genus-specific primer set was only tested using sequence databases (Murakami et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 16S DNA primer Spf-190, specific for Sphingomonas sp. (26), and the universal 16S DNA primer Univ-16S-536-A-18 (P. A. Willumsen and B. M. Hansen, unpublished data) were used to identify isolates belonging to the genus Sphingomonas sensu lato. Identification of the Sphingomonas strains was further verified by PCR amplification with the 16S DNA primers Sphingo-108F and Sphingo-429R, which are specific for the genera Sphingobium, Novosphingobium, Sphingopyxis, and Sphingomonas belonging to the Sphingomodaceae family (N. Leys, A. Reyngaert, L. Bastiaens, E. Top, and D. Springael, unpublished data).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%