1995
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-58.5.555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Species Substitution in Raw and Cooked Meats Using Immunoassays

Abstract: Federal and state laws require that raw and cooked meats be accurately represented as to the species of meat they contain. A total of 806 raw and 96 cooked meat samples collected from Florida retail markets were examined for regulatory control of these products. An agar-gel immunodiffusion method was used for the identification of beef, pork and horse species in uncured raw meats. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to identify poultry and sheep in raw meats and all species in cured raw meats and cook… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
40
2
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
40
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1D), however, the unspecified presence of mutton (sheep) was prominent in a number of sample categories, including sausages, minced meats and burgers. Such findings are comparable to the reports from other studies (Hsieh et al, 1995;, in which beef and sheep were identified in turkey mince, pork mince and pork sausages. While the deliberate substitution of animal proteins with expensive beef or mutton is generally not anticipated, possible reasons for their undisclosed presence are due to cross contamination or the addition of nonconforming meat products/rework into non-identical formulations (Ayaz et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1D), however, the unspecified presence of mutton (sheep) was prominent in a number of sample categories, including sausages, minced meats and burgers. Such findings are comparable to the reports from other studies (Hsieh et al, 1995;, in which beef and sheep were identified in turkey mince, pork mince and pork sausages. While the deliberate substitution of animal proteins with expensive beef or mutton is generally not anticipated, possible reasons for their undisclosed presence are due to cross contamination or the addition of nonconforming meat products/rework into non-identical formulations (Ayaz et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results emerging from the studies of Hsieh,Woodward, and Ho (1995) and Ayaz et al (2006) indicated that meat species substitution occurs more regularly in processed meat commodities, for instance in ground, comminuted, cured and value-added products. One possible reason for this may lie in the fact that deliberate substitution with cheaper species is more difficult to detect in such products by visual observation than it is in fresh, intact meat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods such as electrophoresis, chromatography and DNA-based assays are available for the detection of all animal species present in the meat products (Hsieh et al 1995;Macedo-Silva et al 2000;Rodríguez et al 2004;Kesmen et al 2007;Rao & Hsieh 2007). Evaluation of collagen content is the major method for the tissue differentiation in the meat products using spectroscopic and chromatographic techniques (Colgrave et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 806 raw and 96 cooked meat samples collected from Florida retail markets were examined for regulatory control of these products. Results indicated that the overall rate of substituted species in both cooked and (13). Different species; beef, horse, mule, donkey, buffalo, elk, reindeer, pork, lamb, goat, kangaroo, and ostrich were tested in a study in Norway of the products sliced, frozen red meat, pork salami, boiled canned pork and "Lammerull".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%