2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-019-05100-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of small numbers of iPSCs in different heterogeneous cell mixtures with highly sensitive droplet digital PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection methods and efficiency are listed in Table 4 . 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 Flow cytometry is one of the most common strategies for the detection of residual undifferentiated hPSCs using antibodies against hPSC‐specific transcription factors and/or cell surface markers. Kuroda et al assessed the detection efficiency of hPSCs using five antibodies that recognize stem cell marker antigens (OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, TRA‐1‐60, and TRA‐1‐81) and showed that anti‐OCT4, anti‐SOX2, and anti‐TRA‐1‐60 antibodies distinguished hiPSCs from hiPSC‐derived retinal pigment epithelial cells (hiPSC‐RPE).…”
Section: In Vitro Tumorigenicity Tests For Hpsc ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The detection methods and efficiency are listed in Table 4 . 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 Flow cytometry is one of the most common strategies for the detection of residual undifferentiated hPSCs using antibodies against hPSC‐specific transcription factors and/or cell surface markers. Kuroda et al assessed the detection efficiency of hPSCs using five antibodies that recognize stem cell marker antigens (OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, TRA‐1‐60, and TRA‐1‐81) and showed that anti‐OCT4, anti‐SOX2, and anti‐TRA‐1‐60 antibodies distinguished hiPSCs from hiPSC‐derived retinal pigment epithelial cells (hiPSC‐RPE).…”
Section: In Vitro Tumorigenicity Tests For Hpsc ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artyuhov et al showed that the detection limit of OCT4 , TGDF , and LIN28 was 0.01%, whereas that with ddPCR was 0.002%. 94 Watanabe et al reported a detection efficiency of 0.00002% when ddPCR was performed after enrichment of stem cell markers using magnetic beads. 97 In addition, it has been reported that the detection efficiency of hPSCs in hPSC‐CMs suggests that ddPCR is more suitable than qPCR for the assessment of residual undifferentiated hPSCs.…”
Section: In Vitro Tumorigenicity Tests For Hpsc ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, Lin-28 Homolog A (Lin28A), although it is widely clinics for detecting undifferentiated cells in retinal pig-ment epithelial (RPE) cells derived from hiPSCs, similar efficacies in hepatic differentiation could not be replicated [11]. Also, despite OCT4 and TDGF1 being useful detection markers, they are mainly specific to hiPSC-derived neural stem cells [15]. Thus, an important limitation in current research is that the markers identified/developed are specific to certain cell types and cannot be used in other cell lineages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%