2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aml.2017.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of small inhomogeneities via direct sampling method in transverse electric polarization

Abstract: Various studies have confirmed the possibility of identifying the location of a set of small inhomogeneities via a direct sampling method; however, when their permeability differs from that of the background, their location cannot be satisfactorily identified. However, no theoretical explanation for this phenomenon has been verified. In this study, we demonstrate that the indicator function of the direct sampling method can be expressed by the Bessel function of order one of the first kind and explain why the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The indicator function structure (4) implies that the imaging performance is highly dependent on 1) the anomaly's size, permittivity, and conductivity; 2) the antenna configuration (total number and arrangement); and 3) the distance between the transmitter a n and anomaly D m . Observations 1 and 2 have also been made by other studies [3,4,14], but observation 3 is also a significant factor that affects imaging performance in real-world applications, as shown below by the experimental results for Example 4.1.…”
Section: Theoretical Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The indicator function structure (4) implies that the imaging performance is highly dependent on 1) the anomaly's size, permittivity, and conductivity; 2) the antenna configuration (total number and arrangement); and 3) the distance between the transmitter a n and anomaly D m . Observations 1 and 2 have also been made by other studies [3,4,14], but observation 3 is also a significant factor that affects imaging performance in real-world applications, as shown below by the experimental results for Example 4.1.…”
Section: Theoretical Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Several studies have revealed that the direct sampling method (DSM) is a fast, stable, and effective imaging technique in inverse scattering problems. It has been investigated for imaging small two-dimensional anomalies [1,2,3,4] and retrieving three-dimensional objects [5] for diffusive [6] and electrical impedance [7] tomography applications and for source detection in stratified ocean waveguides [8]. As we have previously observed, DSM only requires one or at most a few incident fields, rather than additional operations, such as singular value decomposition [9,10] or solving ill-posed integral equations [11] or adjoint problems [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, by testing orthonormality relation between U and W(r), it will be possible to extract r so that the location of D can be identified. To this end, the typical indicator function F DSM (r, m) has been designed as follows (see [29][30][31]33]):…”
Section: Scattering Parameter and Indicator Functions Of Direct Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct sampling method (DSM) is a fast, effective, and stable noniterative technique for identifying the location or the outline shape of small or extended targets related to various inverse problems. As such, DSM is currently widely applied in many fields, including the identification of two-and three-dimensional small scatterers [29][30][31][32][33][34] or perfectly conducting cracks [35], diffusive optical tomography [36], electrical impedance tomography [37], detecting sources in a stratified ocean waveguide [38], phaseless inverse source scattering problem [39], and mono-static imaging [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to address these types of problems have led to a search for fast and effective identification techniques, and various approaches have been developed. Those include the MUltiple SIgnal Classification (MUSIC) algorithm [11][12][13][14][15], the linear [16][17][18][19][20][21] and direct [22][23][24][25][26] sampling methods, and topological derivatives [27][28][29][30][31]. We also refer to various non-iterative imaging techniques [32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%