2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of significant climatic precession variability in early Pleistocene glacial cycles

Abstract: Despite having a large influence on summer insolation, climatic precession is thought to account for little variance in early Pleistocene proxies of ice volume and deep-water temperature. Various mechanisms have been suggested to account for the dearth of precession variability, including meridional insolation gradients, interhemispheric cancellation of ice-volume changes, and antiphasing between the duration and intensity of summer insolation. We employ a method termed Empirical Nonlinear Orbital Fitting (ENO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
35
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Benthic δ 18 O is a key parameter in paleoceanography for understanding global climate evolution and is often used to study Plio-Pleistocene ice sheet response to orbital forcing through the amplitude evolution of its orbital frequencies (e.g., Liautaud et al, 2020;Lisiecki & Raymo, 2007) and as a constraint for ice sheet evolution models (de Boer et al, 2014;Pollard & DeConto, 2009). Three main features of Plio-Pleistocene benthic δ 18 O records are as follows: (1) obliquity frequency amplitude modulation (1/41 kyr −1 ) that matches the amplitude modulation of the orbital forcing prior to 1.4 Ma, (2) amplitude evolution of the precession frequencies (1/19-1/23 kyr −1 ) that is similar to the amplitude modulation of the orbital forcing but increases exponentially during the Pleistocene, and (3) an increase in ∼1/100 kyr −1 eccentricity frequency amplitude after 1.4 Ma that does not match orbital forcing (Lisiecki & Raymo, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benthic δ 18 O is a key parameter in paleoceanography for understanding global climate evolution and is often used to study Plio-Pleistocene ice sheet response to orbital forcing through the amplitude evolution of its orbital frequencies (e.g., Liautaud et al, 2020;Lisiecki & Raymo, 2007) and as a constraint for ice sheet evolution models (de Boer et al, 2014;Pollard & DeConto, 2009). Three main features of Plio-Pleistocene benthic δ 18 O records are as follows: (1) obliquity frequency amplitude modulation (1/41 kyr −1 ) that matches the amplitude modulation of the orbital forcing prior to 1.4 Ma, (2) amplitude evolution of the precession frequencies (1/19-1/23 kyr −1 ) that is similar to the amplitude modulation of the orbital forcing but increases exponentially during the Pleistocene, and (3) an increase in ∼1/100 kyr −1 eccentricity frequency amplitude after 1.4 Ma that does not match orbital forcing (Lisiecki & Raymo, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If anti-phased precessional variations in ice volume did occur in the earliest Pleistocene in the mode of Raymo et al (2006), then the gradual increase in the amplitude of precession might reflect the expansion of northern hemisphere icesheets and a growing imbalance in northern and southern contributions to sea level, such that they would no longer cancel each other in the benthic δ 18 O record (Liautaud et al 2020). Alternatively, the steady intensification of the precession signal through the Quaternary simply reflects the gradual southward extension of northern hemisphere ice-sheet margins to lower latitudes, where the influence of precessional insolation changes is stronger (Liautaud et al 2020).…”
Section: Croll In the Context Of The Modern Synthesis Of A Theory Of Ice Agesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…interhemispheric cancellation of ice-volume changes ( Raymo et al, 2006), summer duration and intensity being anti-phased (Huybers, 2006) and meridional insolation gradients (Raymo & Nisancioglu, 2003). A recent study using statistical methods argues that precession has a stronger contribution than previously recognized in the early Pleistocene and increases through this epoch (Liautaud et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These proxies show that Pleistocene glacial climates initially varied Confidential manuscript submitted to Geophysical Research Letters with a periodicity of around 40 kyr switching to 100 kyr around million years ago. The precession signal is modulated by eccentricity, and is weaker in the early Pleistocene and stronger in late Pleistocene records (Huybers, 2011;Liautaud et al, 2020). Numerous hypotheses have been proposed to explain the weak precession signal in the early Pleistocene proxies, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%