2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of schizophrenia using hybrid of deep learning and brain effective connectivity image from electroencephalogram signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several factors, including the number of EEG trials, the type and number of microstate features (i.e., MsMC), and the feature selection method (i.e., feature importance score calculation) may have contributed to this difference. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity scores reported here are comparable with some deep learning approaches that use EEG microstates for SZ classification [ 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ]. The fact that findings obtained from our optimized ML approach were comparable to deep learning methods in terms of performance but outperformed in computation and time of processing (i.e., our method [order of minutes] vs. [order of hours]) potentially provide a more rapid, efficient way to achieve an optimized SZ classification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Several factors, including the number of EEG trials, the type and number of microstate features (i.e., MsMC), and the feature selection method (i.e., feature importance score calculation) may have contributed to this difference. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity scores reported here are comparable with some deep learning approaches that use EEG microstates for SZ classification [ 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ]. The fact that findings obtained from our optimized ML approach were comparable to deep learning methods in terms of performance but outperformed in computation and time of processing (i.e., our method [order of minutes] vs. [order of hours]) potentially provide a more rapid, efficient way to achieve an optimized SZ classification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Table 2 provides a comprehensive summary of various studies that have used deep learning methods for the detection of SCZ using EEG. The method presented in Bagherzadeh et al (2022) employ Butterworth filters and Transfer Entropy (TE) in conjunction with various deep learning architectures, including VGG-16, ResNet50V2, InceptionV3, EfficientNetB0, DenseNet121, and CNN-LSTM, achieving an impressive accuracy of 99.90% on EEG signals from the IPN database. Aslan and Akin (2022) employs CWT and advanced CNN and VGG16, achieving a high accuracy of 99.5% on both private and IPN EEG data.…”
Section: Schizophrenia Classification Using Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because EEG has portability advantages, lower cost, better tolerability, and higher signal temporal resolution than functional magnetic resonance imaging. It is also an established modality that has been applied in the clinic for diagnosing mental disorders or neurological conditions [9,[13][14][15][16]. Many researchers have developed machine learning methods to classify emotions using EEG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, CNN was combined with a sparse autoencoder and deep neural network to achieve the accuracy of 89.49% and 92.86% to discriminate valence and arousal classes, respectively [25]. Some studies [15,16,30] showed the effectiveness of adding time dependency by combining CNNs and long short-term memory (LSTM). This combination has increased the classification accuracy of EEG signals in neuroscience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation