2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.661358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Nasopharyngeal Samples by Combining MALDI-TOF MS and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract: The high infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 makes it essential to develop a rapid and accurate diagnostic test so that carriers can be isolated at an early stage. Viral RNA in nasopharyngeal samples by RT-PCR is currently considered the reference method although it is not recognized as a strong gold standard due to certain drawbacks. Here we develop a methodology combining the analysis of from human nasopharyngeal (NP) samples by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saliva spectra were classified with a high accuracy (i.e., 85%). These results are comparable or better to the performance of ML models already described for COVID-19 diagnosis [8,14]. Several studies established that the SVM model performed the best predictions [8,13,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Saliva spectra were classified with a high accuracy (i.e., 85%). These results are comparable or better to the performance of ML models already described for COVID-19 diagnosis [8,14]. Several studies established that the SVM model performed the best predictions [8,13,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…We noted that the majority of studies did not evaluate performances of ML models on an independent dataset [13,15], but established the performance metrics on the training set. Two studies tested the ML models on an independent dataset [8,14]. The performance of the ML models was noticeably lower than that obtained on the training set, suggesting an overfitting of the model to the training data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations