2017
DOI: 10.2147/lctt.s120172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer: current and future perspectives

Abstract: ROS1 rearrangement characterizes a small subset (1%–2%) of non-small cell lung cancer and is associated with slight/never smoking patients and adenocarcinoma histology. Identification of ROS1 rearrangement is mandatory to permit targeted therapy with specific inhibitors, demonstrating a significantly better survival when compared with conventional chemotherapy. Detection of ROS1 rearrangement is based on in situ (immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization) and extractive non-in situ assays. While… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(84 reference statements)
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…62 Our results regarding ALK and ROS1 fusion were similar to previous reports with the exception of elevated ROS1 fusion frequency (3.9%). 29,30,49,62 A meta-analysis including 1178 ALK rearranged cases from 20 541 NSCLC patients indicated that age, gender, smoking status, histology, tumor stage, and ethnicity may be a source of between-study heterogeneity. 19 According to the reference studies from three nations, there is obvious across population/subpopulation similarity and heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…62 Our results regarding ALK and ROS1 fusion were similar to previous reports with the exception of elevated ROS1 fusion frequency (3.9%). 29,30,49,62 A meta-analysis including 1178 ALK rearranged cases from 20 541 NSCLC patients indicated that age, gender, smoking status, histology, tumor stage, and ethnicity may be a source of between-study heterogeneity. 19 According to the reference studies from three nations, there is obvious across population/subpopulation similarity and heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although the recently updated CAP/IASLC/AMP molecular testing guidelines allow the use of ROS1 IHC for screening purposes, there has been only one antibody available to date (D4D6). [9][10][11] The sensitivity for this clone was controversial, probably reflecting the different interpretation criteria and the small numbers that were tested in most studies (reviewed in 9,10,[25][26][27][28] ). The recent release of a new clone (SP384), with only one published report available to date, provides an in vitro diagnostic alternative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, one of the more commonly used IHC assays in the clinic is the ROS1 D4D6 rabbit monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, Massachusetts), which is a research-use-only (RUO) assay. 6 With an RUO product, a variety of protocols, detection kits, and staining platforms are used. [9][10][11] This leads to variation in staining and interpretation of ROS1 IHC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…clinical practice, owing to its usefulness in clinical trials for determining ROS1 positivity. 6 An RT-PCR assay, on the other hand, is highly sensitive for detecting specific fusions, which the assay was designed to detect. However, owing to the more than 25 known different fusions and additional unknown fusions, it is difficult to design a multiplex PCR that is able to detect all possible rearrangements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation