2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Residual Pulmonary Vascular Obstruction by Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scan Late After a First Pulmonary Embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity analyses were performed on the association between RPO and recurrent VTE (Table ). These analyses confirmed the association between recurrent VTE and RPO ( a ) on lung scan regardless of the methods used for RPO assessment, ( b ) in studies assessing RPO at least 3 months after acute PE (significant heterogeneity observed in the analysis of studies assessing RPO at 3 months or earlier after acute PE was mainly related to the study of Chopard et al), ( c ) after the exclusion of asymptomatic recurrence of VTE, ( d ) in patients treated for a first PE, ( e ) in high‐quality studies, and ( f ) in studies with a fixed duration of anticoagulant treatment regardless of the presence or absence of RPO.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Sensitivity analyses were performed on the association between RPO and recurrent VTE (Table ). These analyses confirmed the association between recurrent VTE and RPO ( a ) on lung scan regardless of the methods used for RPO assessment, ( b ) in studies assessing RPO at least 3 months after acute PE (significant heterogeneity observed in the analysis of studies assessing RPO at 3 months or earlier after acute PE was mainly related to the study of Chopard et al), ( c ) after the exclusion of asymptomatic recurrence of VTE, ( d ) in patients treated for a first PE, ( e ) in high‐quality studies, and ( f ) in studies with a fixed duration of anticoagulant treatment regardless of the presence or absence of RPO.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Overall, 192 of 1294 patients with RPO had recurrent VTE (14.8%; 95% CI 13.0‐16.8), as compared with 176 of 2178 without RPO (8.1%; 95% CI 7.0‐9.3). The presence of RPO, either on CT angiography or on lung scan, was associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE without significant heterogeneity (16 studies; 3472 patients; OR according to the random‐effects model, 2.22; 95% CI 1.61‐3.05; I 2 = 26%) (Figure ) . The association was confirmed after amending for zero cells (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.56‐2.90) and after excluding from the analysis the study by Meneveau et al, in which RPO was assessed at an early stage (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.52‐2.93).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations