1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1990.tb04348.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of residual BCR/ABL transcripts in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients in complete remission using the polymerase chain reaction and nested primers

Abstract: We sought evidence of BCR/ABL transcripts in the peripheral blood of nine CML patients in complete clinical and cytogenetic remission after treatment by bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or interferon and in one patient who entered spontaneous remission. Six patients were investigated at different times during their follow-up. We compared results obtained with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using (a) a single-stage PCR comprising 30 cycles of amplification with selected oligomers, and (b) a two-stage proc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, our results confirm those of Lee et al 7 and Hochhaus et al 12 who reported that all complete cytogenetic responders on IFN-␣ have detectable residual disease by two-step RT-PCR independent of the duration of CCR. Although at least 23 cases have been reported 12,13,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] with intermittent or persistent PCR negativity on IFN-␣ using different PCR techniques, these observations may be due to the considerable variability in the sensitivity of PCR techniques performed in different laboratories. Consequently, the PCR negativity reported in CCR patients could be due more to technical discrepancies among different laboratories than to a real cure of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In fact, our results confirm those of Lee et al 7 and Hochhaus et al 12 who reported that all complete cytogenetic responders on IFN-␣ have detectable residual disease by two-step RT-PCR independent of the duration of CCR. Although at least 23 cases have been reported 12,13,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] with intermittent or persistent PCR negativity on IFN-␣ using different PCR techniques, these observations may be due to the considerable variability in the sensitivity of PCR techniques performed in different laboratories. Consequently, the PCR negativity reported in CCR patients could be due more to technical discrepancies among different laboratories than to a real cure of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The following rearrangements or fusion transcripts were investigated on diagnostic material using Southern blot for the detection of MLL rearrangements (Poirel et al, 1996) or reverse transcriptase PCR for t(12;21), t(9;22), t(1;19) and t(4;11) according to previously described methods (Biondi et al, 1993;Hunger et al, 1991;Martiat et al, 1990;Maurer et al, 1991;Shurtleff et al, 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cDNA synthesis and RT PCR was carried out using the 'Geneamp' kit (Applied Biosystems, U.K.) using 1 mg of RNA. PCR primers for the BCR gene were as described by Martiat et al (1990) and for all the ABL exon a3 as described by Cross et al (1993). Primers were purchased from Oswell (Edinburgh, Scotland) and thermal cycling was carried out on a Perkin Elmer 9600 thermal cycler.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%