1997
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: MR imaging versus CT.

Abstract: Both modalities have relatively low sensitivity and moderate specificity in detection of tumor recurrence and in distinguishing recurrence from post-radiation therapy changes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is a highly frequent epithelial malignancy of the head and neck in southern China and parts of Southeast Asia, with a reported annual incidence of 30-80 per 10 5 persons in endemic regions, mainly owing to Asian ancestry and infection with the Epstein-Barr virus. [1][2][3] The mainstay of treatment for nasopharyngeal cancers is using 100 mg m 22 of cisplatin on Days 1, 22 and 43 concurrent with radiotherapy, followed by adjuvant 80 mg m 22 of cisplatin on Day 1 and 1000 mg m 22 of 5-fluorouracil on Days 1-4 for three cycles. 4,5 It is known that stage-adapted therapy significantly improved the survival of patients with cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is a highly frequent epithelial malignancy of the head and neck in southern China and parts of Southeast Asia, with a reported annual incidence of 30-80 per 10 5 persons in endemic regions, mainly owing to Asian ancestry and infection with the Epstein-Barr virus. [1][2][3] The mainstay of treatment for nasopharyngeal cancers is using 100 mg m 22 of cisplatin on Days 1, 22 and 43 concurrent with radiotherapy, followed by adjuvant 80 mg m 22 of cisplatin on Day 1 and 1000 mg m 22 of 5-fluorouracil on Days 1-4 for three cycles. 4,5 It is known that stage-adapted therapy significantly improved the survival of patients with cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both MRI and CT scans have low sensitivity and moderate specificity for detecting recurrent NPC and for distinguishing recurrence from postradiation therapy changes. 22 However, MRI is superior to CT scans in differentiating postradiation fibrosis from recurrent NPC, although early, distinct differentiation generally is impossible due to immature scars, which, along with well hydrated granulation tissues, generally reveal contrast enhancement. 23 Recently, 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET) or thallium-201, singlephoton emission CT has been recommended for detecting recurrent NPC, particularly when MRI findings are indeterminate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is especially useful when results from the follow-up imaging studies are in doubt, because postirradiation tissue changes are seen commonly in patients with NPC after radiotherapy. 15 The source of cell free EBV DNA in circulation of patients with EBV-harboring malignancy remains somewhat controversial. Intact EBV particles 10,16,17 or free EBV DNA molecules released through the process of tumor death 9,12,18 both may exist in the circulation of patients with active disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%