2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Railway Masts in Airborne LiDAR Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the authors considered both masts and other pole-like object segmentation methods to derive the knowledge gaps. Readers can refer to the authors' previous work Ariyachandra and Brilakis, (2020a), for a comprehensive literature review of each of these methods.…”
Section: Mast Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the authors considered both masts and other pole-like object segmentation methods to derive the knowledge gaps. Readers can refer to the authors' previous work Ariyachandra and Brilakis, (2020a), for a comprehensive literature review of each of these methods.…”
Section: Mast Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of segmenting railway elements in the form of labelled point clusters from PCDs has yet to be solved (Ariyachandra and Brilakis, 2019, 2020a, 2020b. Likewise, the 3D solid model generation of segmented railway element point clusters to represent their geometry is still in its inception.…”
Section: Gaps In Knowledge and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We argue that the strengths of model-driven strategies (providing fast geometrical models without visual deformations [28]) are strong in the scenarios with very low point densities meaning the model-driven methods can create the gDTs of OLE elements despite poor densities and sparseness of the PCD. Hence, our method proposed a fitting of pre-defined parametric assemblies to the point segments obtained using previously sorted mast position coordinates [8]. This proposed method is a re-iterative method throughout the track; it exploits the railway geometric relations mentioned in section 4.1 and railway topology as key factors.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automation of the twinning process will reduce the modelling time and ultimately save costs. We presented a method for generating railway masts as a first step to tackling this challenge [8], which also presented a method for removing the majority of the vegetation and other noise data from the input Point Cloud Data (PCD). The current paper addresses the next step; a method to automatically generate Geometric Digital Twin (gDT)s of railway Overhead Line Equipment (OLE) systems from airborne LiDAR data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%