2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2015.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of radioactive sources in urban scenes using Bayesian Aggregation of data from mobile spectrometers

Abstract: Mobile radiation detector systems aim to help identify dangerous sources of radiation while minimizing frequency of false alarms caused by non-threatening nuisance sources prevalent in cluttered urban scenes. We develop methods for spatially aggregating evidence from multiple spectral observations to simultaneously detect and infer properties of threatening radiation sources. Our Bayesian Aggregation (BA) framework allows sensor fusion across multiple measurements to boost detection capability of a radioactive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This feature become input for random forest regression model that learns to predict the time since start of bleed (equivalent to the amount of blood lost given fixed bleed rate in the referred experiment), and in the process identifies a subset of all features that jointly yields optimal performance. We also create 1 and 5 min moving averages of these derived variables, as well as often reported measures of HR variability along several domains (time and frequency domains, non-linear measures) 21. The time windows determining the features from the raw electrical signal and output classes will vary according to aims.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature become input for random forest regression model that learns to predict the time since start of bleed (equivalent to the amount of blood lost given fixed bleed rate in the referred experiment), and in the process identifies a subset of all features that jointly yields optimal performance. We also create 1 and 5 min moving averages of these derived variables, as well as often reported measures of HR variability along several domains (time and frequency domains, non-linear measures) 21. The time windows determining the features from the raw electrical signal and output classes will vary according to aims.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian approaches to detect, classify, and estimate smuggled nuclear and radiological materials are not a new consideration 6,12 , and were extensively studied for the development of the Statistical Radiation Detection System at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. This group has used Bayesian model-based sequential statistical processing techniques to overcome the low signal-to-background ratio that complicates traditional gamma spectroscopy techniques with high-resolution HPGe and inorganic scintillation detectors 13,14 . Bayesian approaches have also been applied to radionuclide identification for NaI(Tl) detectors using a wavelet-based peak identification algorithm with Bayesian classifiers 15 , for LaBr 3 (Ce) using a sequential approach 16 , and to HPGe detectors using non-parametric Bayesian deconvolution to resolve overlapping peaks 17 .…”
Section: Algorithms For Rpm Signal Unmixingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian aggregation (BA) [22] is used to combine information from multiple measurements to produce a single score for source presence as a function of location. BA is applied to both CEW and PID in the same fashion.…”
Section: Bayesian Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use measurement based simulations to test the performance of detectors with modest spectral resolution (NaI scintillators) both with and without a coded aperture uniform redundant mask providing imaging capability. We analyze the data using two fusion methods, an analytic weighted projection, and Bayesian Aggregation [22] of evidence from multiple spectral measurements. We also consider alternative, weakly supervised methods of scoring individual observations that rely on spectral, spatial, and spatio-spectral analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%