of Adelaide and Tasmania (UAT) was launched from Woomera. Of the four X-ray detectors on board, two (A and B) operated satisfactorily. Both were xenon-filled proportional counters with 0.005 in beryllium windows of 10 cm 2 area, and sensitive to X-rays in the 2-8A wavelength band. Slat collimators in front of the windows restricted the fields of view to 3° X 38° FWHM. The long axes of the collimators were inclined at 45° to each other, with that of detector B being parallel to the rocket spin axis.Above the atmosphere, the rocket spun with a 23 s period and precessed very slowly about a cone of 60° half angle. Over the 250 s of useful observing time, the rocket spin axis had moved only 60° from its original orientation. This meant that although only a fraction of the sky was observed, any point in this area was scanned several times. Hence the sensitivity for the detection of X-ray sources was increased by integrating the count-rates for all times that any potential source was observed-that is to say, by superposing all the scans that passed across the position in question.The most significant increase in count-rate arose from superposition of 5 scans of detector B and 3 scans of detector A. The result was a peak 3.6 standard deviation above the background generated by diffuse X-rays and charged particles. This peak is shown in Figure 1. Such a peak implies an X-ray source with an intensity of approximately 1.5 photons cm -2 s _1 or 10~8 ergs cm~2 s _1 . This is about 1/15 as strong as Sco XR-1-the most intense galactic source at these wavelengths.The configuration of the two collimators allowed the position corresponding to this count-rate peak to be calculated accurately relative to the rocket axes. The orientation of the rocket axes is determined from data from three orthogonal magnetometers and solar sensors with crossed slits. However the motion of this particular rocket was such that in-flight calibration of one magnetometer was not possible, and the diagonal slits of the solar sensors did not see the Sun. These factors have seriously restricted the accuracy of the position deduced for this source. Our position is l n = 145°, b 11 = -60° (2 h .0 R.A., -6° dec.) with an error circle of 15° radius. It is interesting to note that no survey of greater sensitivity has been made of this particular area of the sky.This position was, however, scanned by the earlier UAT experiments, Flights I and II, launched in April, 1967. 1 During the first flight, the 10°.5 FWHM angular response of the collimators meant that the Sun was observed at the same time as the above source position. Consequently any X-rays from this position were obscured by the large flux from the Sun. During the second flight the detectors were able to resolve the Sun and the aforementioned position. Superposition of four scans revealed a peak 2.7 standard deviations above background which implies a source intensity compatible with that from Flight III. If the Flight II peak is considered together with the larger peak from Flight III, we are con...