Detection of quantitative trait loci for maternal traits using high-density genotypes of Blonde d’Aquitaine beef cattle

Abstract

BackgroundThe genetic determinism of the calving and suckling performance of beef cows is little known whereas these maternal traits are of major economic importance in beef cattle production systems. This paper aims to identify QTL regions and candidate genes that affect maternal performance traits in the Blonde d’Aquitaine breed. Three calving performance traits were studied: the maternal effect on calving score from field data, the calving score and pelvic opening recorded in station for primiparous cows. Three other traits related to suckling performance were also analysed: the maternal effect on weaning weight from field data, milk yield and the udder swelling score recorded in station for primiparous cows. A total of 2,505 animals were genotyped from various chip densities and imputed in high density chips for 706,791 SNP. The number of genotyped animals with phenotypes ranged from 1,151 to 2,284, depending on the trait considered.ResultsQTL detections were performed using a Bayes C approach. Evidence for a QTL was based on Bayes Factor values. Putative candidate genes were proposed for the QTL with major evidence for one of the six traits and for the QTL shared by at least two of the three traits underlying either calving or suckling performance. Nine candidate genes were proposed for calving performance among the nine highlighted QTL regions. The neuroregulin gene on chromosome 27 was notably identified as a very likely candidate gene for maternal calving performance. As for suckling abilities, seven candidate genes were identified among the 15 highlighted QTL. In particular, the Group-Specific Component gene on chromosome 6, which encodes vitamin D binding protein, is likely to have a major effect on maternal weaning weight in the Blonde d’Aquitaine breed. This gene had already been linked to milk production and clinical mastitis in dairy cattle.ConclusionIn the near future, these QTL findings and the preliminary proposals of candidate genes which act on the maternal performance of beef cows should help to identify putative causal mutations based on sequence data from different cattle breeds.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12863-016-0397-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Genetic Parameters and Genome-Wide Association Studies for Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels and Antral Follicle Populations Measured After Estrus Synchronization in Nellore Cattle

“…There are known QTLs located in the genomic regions identified in this study, including associations with calving performance (e.g., calving ease, calf size) [84]. In agreement with our findings, previous studies in Angus and Hereford cattle detected the MAPK signaling pathway as having a pleiotropic effect on birth weight, calving ease (direct and maternal), and calving performance traits [85][86][87][88]. Likewise, QTLs linked to gestation length, the interval to first estrus after calving [89], conception rate [90], and heifer pregnancy [91] overlapped with various genomic regions identified for AMH and AFP.…”

Genetic architecture and genomic selection of female reproduction traits in rainbow trout

“…As proposed by Kass and Raftery [26], the logBF was computed as twice the natural logarithm of the BF and the threshold logBF ≥ 6 was used for defining evidence for a QTL. As proposed by Michenet et al [27], a credibility interval was built around the peak SNP integrating to the QTL region the SNPs with logBF ≥ 3 that were located close to the peak SNP using a sliding window of 1 Mb on both sides of the peak SNP. Following Michenet et al [27], we considered that a peak SNP with 6 ≤ logBF < 8 corresponded only to a putative QTL unless the QTL region explained at least 1% of the genetic variance; in that case, the QTL was considered as having a strong effect on the trait of interest.…”

Genetic determinism of spontaneous masculinisation in XX female rainbow trout: new insights using medium throughput genotyping and whole-genome sequencing

“…In order to define QTL with the BayesCπ approaches, we considered two categories to classify the strength of the evidence in favour of a QTL 33 : strong evidence for 8 ≤ logBF < 10 and very strong evidence for logBF ≥ 10. Because the BF is not a statistic test, true confidence intervals cannot be derived, but credibility intervals can be built as defined in Michenet et al 34 . Credibility intervals were determined using the threshold logBF ≥ 8 for defining a peak SNP showing evidence for a QTL in either a BCπ-chip or a BCπ-seq analysis.…”