2005
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73095-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Quantitative Trait Loci Influencing Conformation Traits and Calving Ease in Holstein-Friesian Cattle

Abstract: An extension of our previous genome scan of a North American Holstein-Friesian population was conducted to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting conformation traits. Resource families consisted of 1404 sons of 10 elite sires. Genome coverage was estimated to be 2713.5 cM (90%) for 406 markers using a granddaughter design. Regression interval mapping was used to detect QTL affecting 22 conformation traits, including body, udder, feet and legs, and dairy conformation as well as calving ease. Analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The CACNA2D1 gene could be studied more as a candidate gene influencing reproduction, carcass, and growth traits, as it was for meat quality traits of pigs (Li et al 2008). The cattle CACNA2D1 gene is located within the genomic region of the QTLs for carcass weight (Casas et al 2001), average daily gain (Casas et al 2001), stature (Ashwell et al 2005), bone percentage (Gutiérrez-Gil et al 2009), meat-tobone ratio (Gutiérrez-Gil et al 2009), and residual feed intake (Sherman et al 2009). The QTLs affecting longissimus muscle area (Takasuga et al 2007), marbling score (Yokouchi et al 2009), and feed conversion ratio (Sherman et al 2009) have also been found near the area of the CACNA2D1 gene.…”
Section: Gene-specific Snp Marker Association Analysis With Economic mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CACNA2D1 gene could be studied more as a candidate gene influencing reproduction, carcass, and growth traits, as it was for meat quality traits of pigs (Li et al 2008). The cattle CACNA2D1 gene is located within the genomic region of the QTLs for carcass weight (Casas et al 2001), average daily gain (Casas et al 2001), stature (Ashwell et al 2005), bone percentage (Gutiérrez-Gil et al 2009), meat-tobone ratio (Gutiérrez-Gil et al 2009), and residual feed intake (Sherman et al 2009). The QTLs affecting longissimus muscle area (Takasuga et al 2007), marbling score (Yokouchi et al 2009), and feed conversion ratio (Sherman et al 2009) have also been found near the area of the CACNA2D1 gene.…”
Section: Gene-specific Snp Marker Association Analysis With Economic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cattle CACNA2D1 gene has been mapped to BTA 4q18 (Buitkamp et al 2003). It is located within the genomic region of seven QTLs, for carcass weight (Casas et al 2001), average daily gain (Casas et al 2001), stature (Ashwell et al 2005), bone percentage (Gutiérrez-Gil et al 2009), meat-tobone ratio (Gutiérrez-Gil et al 2009), residual feed intake (Sherman et al 2009), and somatic cell score (Zhang et al 1998;Rupp and Boichard 2003). Four QTLs affecting the longissimus muscle area (Takasuga et al 2007;Mizoshita et al 2004), marbling score (Yokouchi et al 2009), feed conversion ratio (Sherman et al 2009), and somatic cell count (Longeri et al 2006) have also been found near the area (NAGRP 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schrooten et al [22] used microsatellite markers in a whole genome scan for QTLs affecting 18 conformation traits. Ashwell et al [23] detected QTLs affecting 22 conformation traits, including body, udder, feet, legs, and dairy conformation, and found 41 chromosome-wise significant QTLs. Cole et al [8] used a single-locus model to analyze 18 body conformation traits , which included six trait groups, body size, body shape, udder, teats, teats, feet and legs, and final score and reported the top 100 effects for each trait.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These may be the same QTL as detected in the present study for ST and MS because the marker map in this study did not extend to the region of the chromosome with the earlier findings and because confidence intervals are likely to be large. Also, Ashwell et al (2005) found a chromosome-wise suggestive QTL for ST in the proximal end of the chromosome and Schrooten et al (2000) found a chromosome-wise significant QTL for MS between the markers BM1258 and GBCYP21. Further, Hiendleder et al (2003) found a suggestive QTL for teat length at the distal end of BTA23.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%