2011 IEEE 19th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/siu.2011.5929739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of pedestrians from still images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The motivation of this approach is to detect whether the area contains legs [16]. The legs are vertical or near-vertical parts of the body so if a detected area has vertical edges at the bottom half of the area, it is labeled as a pedestrian candidate, and otherwise it is discarded (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The motivation of this approach is to detect whether the area contains legs [16]. The legs are vertical or near-vertical parts of the body so if a detected area has vertical edges at the bottom half of the area, it is labeled as a pedestrian candidate, and otherwise it is discarded (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, computation time increases with the increasing number of features. Secondly, there could be irrelevant features and by using the irrelevant features, performance of the classifier might reduce [16]. To avoid from these two pitfalls, an Adaboost algorithm [14] is applied to the data.…”
Section: F(1) = (A + B) / (C + D + 1) F(2) = (A + C) / (B + D + 1) F(mentioning
confidence: 99%