2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of pathogenic bacteria in the blood from sepsis patients using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis

Abstract: Prompt identification of causative pathogenic bacteria is imperative for the treatment of patients suffering from infectious diseases, including sepsis and pneumonia. However, current culture-based methodologies have several drawbacks including their limitation of use to culturable bacterial species. To circumvent these problems, we attempted to detect bacterial DNA in blood using next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) technology. We conducted metagenomic and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, there are no reports on the detection of bacteria directly in the blood using FISH, apart from the studies by our team, so we cannot compare the obtained results with other studies [13,20]. With the use of FISH, a high percentage of genetic material of Gram-negative bacteria in the blood samples of healthy individuals was detected, which would argue for the translocation of bacteria into the bloodstream and, generally, for the existence of bacterial DNAemia phenomenon, in completely healthy people [39][40][41]. The presence of bacterial ribosomal RNA signals the presence of bacterial cells, hence, also their DNA, since ribonucleic acid degrades very quickly, in contrast to deoxyribonucleic acid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the literature, there are no reports on the detection of bacteria directly in the blood using FISH, apart from the studies by our team, so we cannot compare the obtained results with other studies [13,20]. With the use of FISH, a high percentage of genetic material of Gram-negative bacteria in the blood samples of healthy individuals was detected, which would argue for the translocation of bacteria into the bloodstream and, generally, for the existence of bacterial DNAemia phenomenon, in completely healthy people [39][40][41]. The presence of bacterial ribosomal RNA signals the presence of bacterial cells, hence, also their DNA, since ribonucleic acid degrades very quickly, in contrast to deoxyribonucleic acid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…water) in our previous sequencing analyses. 24 In addition, as for the other bacterial species found in the Sample #12, Deinococcus proteolyticus, these are commonly found from materials, surfaces and dust contaminated by humans and animals as well as soil and sewage. 25 Therefore, these detected bacterial species in the Sample #12 likely reflect human contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were found (Hornok et al 2019). Identification of infectious bacteria from the bloodstream, particularly in humans are usually performed using blood cultures, but different studies compared this method with the 16S metagenomics, showing that this later technique is more sensitive and specific (Decuypere et al 2016, Rutanga et al 2018, Watanabe et al 2018]. The blood tested for those studies was fresh however there are no studies that have tested the sensitivity in partly degraded heart or heart tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%