1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb10891.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Parasites in Fish by Superconducting Quantum Interference Device Magnetometry

Abstract: Candling, the traditional means of detecting parasites during fish fillet processing, is time consuming and labor intensive. This method is a major factor in reducing the quality and increasing the cost of fish brought to market. The difference in electrical conductivity between fish and an embedded parasite was hypothesized to be a practical basis for an instrument which would have potential for automated parasite detection. A small electrical current was passed through a parasite-containing fillet and the ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the fishing industry, the primary optical method of detecting parasites in fish fillets is time consuming, labour intensive and only marginally effective. Jenks and co-workers at Vanderbilt showed [49] that parasites found in certain ocean-going fish have a magnetic signature similar to spherical holes in a conducting plate when current was passed through the fish. This discovery could lead to an automated process for the detection and removal of such parasites.…”
Section: The Current Injection Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the fishing industry, the primary optical method of detecting parasites in fish fillets is time consuming, labour intensive and only marginally effective. Jenks and co-workers at Vanderbilt showed [49] that parasites found in certain ocean-going fish have a magnetic signature similar to spherical holes in a conducting plate when current was passed through the fish. This discovery could lead to an automated process for the detection and removal of such parasites.…”
Section: The Current Injection Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inexpensive small items may also be a possibility provided they can be scanned very quickly. Jenks et al [49] recently estimated 1-2 s scan times for detection of parasites in fish fillets, an apparently mundane NDE problem that accounts for approximately one-half the cost of harvesting and marketing certain white fish.…”
Section: Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One problem of the ultrasonic method is the requirement of direct coupling between detector and measurement medium, and this is one reason why the technique has not been industrialized. Jenks and others (1996) obtained promising results by measurement of the electrical conductivity in fish and parasites. The method, however, requires the fillet to be placed in a saline solution and this may be impractical in view of possible industrialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are being applied by fishery operators or laboratories. Recent techniques including ultraviolet illumination (Adams et al, 1999;Levsen et al, 2005;Marty, 2008), ultrasound (Hafsteinsson et al, 1989;Nilsen et al, 2008), X-rays and conductivity (Nilsen et al, 2008), electromagnetism (Choudhury and Bublitz, 1994), magnetometry ( Jenks et al, 1996), immunological techniques (Xu et al, 2010;Rodríguez-Mahillo et al, 2010), polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based (Zhu et al, 2002;Abe et al, 2005;Pontes et al, 2005), real-time PCR (Herrero et al, 2010;Fang et al, 2011), phage display (Ló pez et al, 2011), real-time fluorescence resonance energy transfer (Monis et al, 2005;Intapan et al, 2008), or imaging spectroscopy (Heia et al, 2007) are under continuous improvement processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%