2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of ochratoxin A in beer samples with a label-free monolithically integrated optoelectronic biosensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This weaker attachment of the aptamer to the surface favors the aptamer–OTA interaction, the displacement of the aptamer, and cargo delivery. However, both LOD values comply with those established by the legislation and are similar to or better than most published techniques for the detection of OTA (see Table S4) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This weaker attachment of the aptamer to the surface favors the aptamer–OTA interaction, the displacement of the aptamer, and cargo delivery. However, both LOD values comply with those established by the legislation and are similar to or better than most published techniques for the detection of OTA (see Table S4) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This weaker attachment of the aptamer to the surfacef avors the aptamer-OTAi nteraction, the displacement of the aptamer,a nd cargo delivery.H owever,b oth LOD values comply with those established by the legislation and are similar to or better than most published techniques for the detection of OTA( see Ta ble S4). [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] Additionally,t he selectivity of S3 (Figure 3i nb lack) and S5 ( Figure 3i ng rey) to OTAw as also studied. With this aim, cargo releasefrom S3 and S5 was testedi np resence of OTA, fumonisin B1 and aflatoxin B1.…”
Section: Sensitivity and Selectivity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunosensors using enzymatic labels (e.g., HRP, AP) tend to be sensitive because of the potential for significant amplification provided by the enzyme. They also tend to use commonly available optical or electrochemical readers that are relatively inexpensive [32][33][34][35][36]. The downside to these immunoassays is that most require additional steps (e.g., washing, adding substrate and/or mediator) that are avoidable with certain other formats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optical immunosensor for label-free detection of OTA in beer samples has been proposed by Pagkali et al [36]. The biosensor consisted of an array of ten monolithically integrated Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZIs) along with their respective broad-band silicon light sources on the same Si chip.…”
Section: Biosensors For the Detection Of Ochratoxin A In Wine Beer Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aptamers, due to their excellent selectivity and large robustness , are exceptional recognition elements for fabricating biosensors. Several designs of aptamers‐based biosensors (aptasensors) have been proposed to detect OTA within the range of 0.173 pM–17 nM . In most of these studies low LODs have been achieved mainly by the use of amplifying elements like nanoparticles, proteins and enzymes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%