2003
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2003.1188902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of obstacles in the flight path of an aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past three decades, a two‐stage processing paradigm has emerged for the simultaneous detection and tracking of dim, subpixel‐sized targets (Arnold, Shaw, & Pasternack, 1993; Barniv, 1985; Gandhi, Yang, Kasturi, Camps, Coraor, et al, 2003, 2006). These two stages are (1) an image preprocessing stage that, within each frame, highlights potential targets with attributes of interest and (2) a subsequent temporal filtering stage that exploits target dynamics across frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past three decades, a two‐stage processing paradigm has emerged for the simultaneous detection and tracking of dim, subpixel‐sized targets (Arnold, Shaw, & Pasternack, 1993; Barniv, 1985; Gandhi, Yang, Kasturi, Camps, Coraor, et al, 2003, 2006). These two stages are (1) an image preprocessing stage that, within each frame, highlights potential targets with attributes of interest and (2) a subsequent temporal filtering stage that exploits target dynamics across frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific implementations of the morphological filtering approach include the hit‐or‐miss filter (Schaefer & Casasent, 1995), close‐minus‐open filter (Casasent & Ye, 1997), and top‐hat filter (Braga‐Neto, Choudhary, & Goutsias, 2004). Although a large proportion of research has focused on IR images, there are recent examples of morphological filters being incorporated into target detection algorithms operating on visual spectrum images (Carnie, Walker, & Corke, 2006; Gandhi et al, 2003, 2006). Moreover, a sign of the increasing popularity of morphological filters for small target detection is evident in the host of studies undertaken into the issue of parameter design (Yu, Wu, Wu, & Li, 2003; Zeng, Li, & Peng, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is well known that morphology techniques are computationally intensive requiring parallelised implementation or dedicated hardware to meet real-time requirements. Finally, morphology approaches are noted as returning a large number of false positives [15,16,17] with computationally intensive techniques used to post-process the detections.…”
Section: Algorithm Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerial surveillance systems (ASS) contained with wire detector must be able to extract these small obstacles efficiently to ensure the safety of the aircrafts [2][3][4][5]. However, the problem of wire collision is still a major issue recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%