2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-018-2723-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of nucleic acids and elimination of carryover contamination by using loop-mediated isothermal amplification and antarctic thermal sensitive uracil-DNA-glycosylase in a lateral flow biosensor: application to the detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Abstract: The authors report on a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) scheme that uses antarctic thermally sensitive uracil-DNA-glycosylase (AUDG) for simultaneous detection of nucleic acids and elimination of carryover contamination. It was applied in a lateral flow assay (LFA) format. The assay has attractive features in that it does not require the use of labeled primers or probes, and can eliminate false-positive results generated by unwanted hybridization between two labeled primers or between a labeled p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minor differences between LAMP sensitivities could be explained by the higher number of replicates that we used for LOD calculation, as suggested by guidelines (FDA, 2001), in comparison to the number of replicates considered in the referenced studies (<3). The LOD described in our study is also in concordance with the value of 100-500 CFU/mL (between 10 3 and 10 4 cp/mL) targeting the 16S rRNA gene (Huy et al, 2012) and the ply gene (Wang et al, 2018). Conversely, another published work established a LOD about 300 pg/µL (10 5 copies/µl) for a specific LAMP test based on SYBR Green fluorophore and using a portable tube scanner (Xia et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Minor differences between LAMP sensitivities could be explained by the higher number of replicates that we used for LOD calculation, as suggested by guidelines (FDA, 2001), in comparison to the number of replicates considered in the referenced studies (<3). The LOD described in our study is also in concordance with the value of 100-500 CFU/mL (between 10 3 and 10 4 cp/mL) targeting the 16S rRNA gene (Huy et al, 2012) and the ply gene (Wang et al, 2018). Conversely, another published work established a LOD about 300 pg/µL (10 5 copies/µl) for a specific LAMP test based on SYBR Green fluorophore and using a portable tube scanner (Xia et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It should be noted that total time required for PCR amplification could be reduced with cycle alterations slightly below 1 h. However, we followed the PCR protocol recommended by the CDC to ensure adequate sensitivity and specificity while achieving much faster time of amplification with LAMP. The LAMP reaction is a single tube technique for DNA amplification that does not require thermal cyclers (Huy et al, 2012;Xia et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2018). In addition, amplification can be detected by turbidimetry or visual color change without the need for any other equipment (Huy et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pneumoniae as low as 447 CFU/ml (equivalent to 4.47 CFU per reaction), which is similar to that of LAMP [19]. Thus, ply-MCDA assay was a sensitive method for S. pneumoniae detection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The detection limit of ply-MCDA assay was 10fg (Fig.3). It has been reported that LAMP can detect S. pneumoniae as few as 25 fg [19] or 20 fg [20]. We also assessed the clinical sensitivity of this assay by using spiked sputum samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation