2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2020.103980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of multiple complicated flaw clusters by dynamic variable-node XFEM with a three-step detection algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In References 20-29, to detect the internal flaws of a structure, an objective function was constructed based on its dynamic responses. These methods have been successfully applied to the quantitative detection of structural flaws, from the identification of a single flaw [8][9][10][11]17,21,29 to multiple flaws, [12][13][14][15][16]18,19,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and from flaw identification in homogeneous materials to that in heterogeneous ones. 20,23 These methods can identify void-and crack-like flaws.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In References 20-29, to detect the internal flaws of a structure, an objective function was constructed based on its dynamic responses. These methods have been successfully applied to the quantitative detection of structural flaws, from the identification of a single flaw [8][9][10][11]17,21,29 to multiple flaws, [12][13][14][15][16]18,19,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and from flaw identification in homogeneous materials to that in heterogeneous ones. 20,23 These methods can identify void-and crack-like flaws.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For practical problems, the dynamic responses of a structure can be measured more easily. In References 20–29, to detect the internal flaws of a structure, an objective function was constructed based on its dynamic responses. These methods have been successfully applied to the quantitative detection of structural flaws, from the identification of a single flaw 8–11,17,21,29 to multiple flaws, 12–16,18,19,22–28 and from flaw identification in homogeneous materials to that in heterogeneous ones 20,23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very recent study from Du et al 26 proposed a novel strategy for detecting multiple flaws based on dynamic XFEM in the time domain and an improved artificial bee-colony algorithm. Ma et al 27 had developed dynamic variable-node XFEM, a method with a three-step algorithm for the detection of multiple complicated flaw clusters. Although dynamic variable-node XFEM 27,28 alleviated significantly the computational effort in forward analysis, the time requirements of dynamic analysis still greatly exceed those of static analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al 27 had developed dynamic variable-node XFEM, a method with a three-step algorithm for the detection of multiple complicated flaw clusters. Although dynamic variable-node XFEM 27,28 alleviated significantly the computational effort in forward analysis, the time requirements of dynamic analysis still greatly exceed those of static analysis. Structural dynamic characteristics (frequencies, mode shapes) and dynamic responses are closely related to structural physical parameters (e.g., mass, stiffness, and damping).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al [31] proposed a triangular extended stochastic finite element method (T-XSFEM) for simulation of random void problems with the aid of variable-node elements to couple/link different mesh-scales. More recently, the V-XFEM are extended for detection of multiple complicated flaw clusters in large structures [32]. Even much efforts in the fracture analyses, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the attention has not been paid to the dynamic fracture problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%