2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of mislabelled seafood products in Malaysia by DNA barcoding: Improving transparency in food market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigations in Asia using DNA barcoding have also reported incidences of mislabelling of fish. In a pioneering forensic fish survey conducted in Malaysia in 2016, 16 percent of raw, frozen or commercially processed fish were found to be mislabelled (Chin Chin et al, 2016). Studies in China using DNA barcoding have also revealed widespread mislabelling of fish on the national market (Xiong et al, 2016a(Xiong et al, , 2016c.…”
Section: Scale and Global Incidence Of Fish Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations in Asia using DNA barcoding have also reported incidences of mislabelling of fish. In a pioneering forensic fish survey conducted in Malaysia in 2016, 16 percent of raw, frozen or commercially processed fish were found to be mislabelled (Chin Chin et al, 2016). Studies in China using DNA barcoding have also revealed widespread mislabelling of fish on the national market (Xiong et al, 2016a(Xiong et al, , 2016c.…”
Section: Scale and Global Incidence Of Fish Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate identification of fish species is a pivotal component to protect the extant ichthyofaunal biodiversity and to perform regular assessments of local fish faunas for conservation planning (Ahmed et al, 2019). Currently, partial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences (DNA barcodes) are applied extensively as a complement to the traditional morpho-taxonomy for standardized and regular species identification (Chin et al, 2016;Filonzi et al, 2010;Hebert et al 2003;Shehata et al, 2019). The marked divergence and lack of overlap between intraspecific and interspecific genetic distances is the primary reason for the selection of COI as the standard barcode gene (Hebert et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies revealed high levels of seafood substitutions in the Americas (e.g., Carvalho et al 2011Carvalho et al , 2015Hanner et al 2011;Willette et al 2017), Europe (Harris et al 2016;Miller et al 2012;Pappalardo and Ferrito 2015), Asia (Chang et al 2016;Nagalakshmi et al 2016;Xiong et al 2016;Chin et al 2016), and elsewhere. In the few studies in the Middle East and North Africa (e.g., Galal-Khallaf et al 2014), the substitution may be as high as 84% in highly processed seafood (Keskin and Atar 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%