The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of mineralization stages using zonality and multifractal modeling based on geological and geochemical data in the Au-(Cu) intrusion-related Gouzal-Bolagh deposit, NW Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, the fractal methods were applied by numerous geoscientific to define the threshold value for the classification of the models [75][76][77]. Different types of fractal models such as spectrum-area (S-A) [78], number-size (N-S) [79], densityarea (D-A) [80], and concentration-volume (C-V) [81] were successfully used by several researchers. In this study, the concentration area (C-A) proposed by Cheng et al [82] was applied (Figures 5b and 6b).…”
Section: Elaborated Model Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the fractal methods were applied by numerous geoscientific to define the threshold value for the classification of the models [75][76][77]. Different types of fractal models such as spectrum-area (S-A) [78], number-size (N-S) [79], densityarea (D-A) [80], and concentration-volume (C-V) [81] were successfully used by several researchers. In this study, the concentration area (C-A) proposed by Cheng et al [82] was applied (Figures 5b and 6b).…”
Section: Elaborated Model Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing studies focus on the geological analysis using existing GIS approaches, plotting stratigraphic columns and statistical graphs for spatial data visualization (Koshnaw et al, 2020;Mouthereau et al, 2007), geologic modelling data using in-situ experiments Heidari et al (2021); Hosseini et al (2021); Lindh and Lemenkova (2022c); Soleimani and Jodeiri Shokri (2016), geochemical data analysis Afzal et al (2017); Lindh and Lemenkova (2022a); Mokhtari and Sadeghi (2021) and do not deal with a detailed explanation of scripting techniques of the geological mapping. As a consequence, they either lack detailed explanation of the techniques of cartographic data visualization (Tavani et al, 2018) or have limited use of scripting in geologic modelling (Lemenkov and Lemenkova, 2021).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous classical models for geochemical anomaly detection such as probability plots, spatial U statistics, and summation of mean and standard deviation [2][3][4][5][6]. Many mathematical processing techniques have been used for the detection of geochemical anomalies since the 1990s, especially concentration-area fractal/multifractal modeling [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], spatial analysis/geoinformatics [17], machine learning (ML) techniques such as neural networks [18][19][20] and deep learning algorithms [21]. On the other hand, two branches exist for geochemical mapping techniques, including structural (e.g., fractal and ML methods) and non-structural methods, especially classical statistics techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%