2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9an02477h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of mephedrone and its metabolites in fingerprints from a controlled human administration study by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and paper spray-mass spectrometry

Abstract: Mephedrone and one of its metabolites have been detected for the first-time in fingerprints collected from a controlled human mephedrone administration study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Czerwinska et al 47 published a first method for the detection of mephedrone and its metabolites in fingerprints by LC–MS/MS and paper spray–mass spectrometry (MS). The stability of mephedrone and dihydro‐mephedrone was carried out as a part of method validation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Czerwinska et al 47 published a first method for the detection of mephedrone and its metabolites in fingerprints by LC–MS/MS and paper spray–mass spectrometry (MS). The stability of mephedrone and dihydro‐mephedrone was carried out as a part of method validation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was conducted by King's College London; details are given elsewhere [60]. Mephedrone powder self-administration (100 mg, corresponding to 1.4 ± 0.2 mg/kg body weight; ingested at 9 a.m.) was carried out via nasal insufflation using a straw under medical supervision.…”
Section: Mephedrone Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to test the performance of different normalization models we generated 100 synthetic data sets with three different methods (simulations v1, v2, v3) and five different n metabolites (4,10,20,40,60) each, where the underlying C, V sweat , and ϵ values were known. Simulations v1, v2, and v3 differ in the way how C was generated (kinetic, random, sampled from real data set, respectively).…”
Section: Synthetic Data Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%