2018
DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/aae1b8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of lung cancer with electronic nose and logistic regression analysis

Abstract: Lung cancer is a very common malignancy with a low five-year survival rate. Artificial olfactory sensor (electronic nose) is a tool that recently has been studied as a probable optimal screening tool for early detection of lung cancer, but still no statistical method has been put forward as the preferable one. The aim of the study was to explore the use of logistic regression analysis (LRA) to analyse patients' exhaled breath samples with electronic nose in order to differentiate lung cancer patients (regardle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose the first sensor responds with r 11 at t 1 second and ( 1 + 1) with 12 . The response of the second sensor at 1 second is 21 , ( 1 + 1) is 22 , and the response of the -th sensor at 1 second…”
Section: B Non-uniform Sampling Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose the first sensor responds with r 11 at t 1 second and ( 1 + 1) with 12 . The response of the second sensor at 1 second is 21 , ( 1 + 1) is 22 , and the response of the -th sensor at 1 second…”
Section: B Non-uniform Sampling Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, logistic regression analysis including clinical parameters in studies using pattern recognition techniques has not been shown often yet. TIRZÏTE et al [19] used logistic regression analysis to predict the presence of lung cancer with the Cyranose 320 electronic nose mainly using segments of exhaled breath as input variables for the logistic regression analysis, but also including a few clinical parameters, such as age, smoking status, smoking history and ambient temperature. They were able to distinguish subjects with lung cancer from controls with a sensitivity of 96% in both smokers and nonsmokers, and a specificity >90% in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VOCs are of interest since they might be directly related to the presence of diseases, they can be tested noninvasively and pattern recognition techniques can serve as classifiers for diseases. Several studies on exhaled-breath analysis have supported the hypothesis that VOC patterns alter when lung cancer is present [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…109 In 2018, several studies were presented or published on this topic and are also summarized in Table 2. 101,105,[110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117] With the exception of one study (de Vries et al 110 ), they all included patients with a suspicion of or proven lung cancer. The percentage of patients with early-stage disease varied between 12% and 79%.…”
Section: Breath-based Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%