2022
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2022.3164397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Localization Failures Using Markov Random Fields With Fully Connected Latent Variables for Safe LiDAR-Based Automated Driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. These estimated values are well-matched with those reported in previous research [34], where maximum errors in heading and lateral position were found to be 1.05 deg and 0.13 m, respectively.…”
Section: Preliminary Investigation On Characteristics Of Localization...supporting
confidence: 90%
“…. These estimated values are well-matched with those reported in previous research [34], where maximum errors in heading and lateral position were found to be 1.05 deg and 0.13 m, respectively.…”
Section: Preliminary Investigation On Characteristics Of Localization...supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Alternatively, researchers utilised Markov random fields with fully-connected latent variables, highlighting that the connections enable their model to consider the entire relation, and aim to identify misalignment, and localisation errors due to misalignment in [110]. They later extended and tested their mechanism for 3D LIDAR-based localisation in automated driving systems in [111]. Identifying obstacles and moving objects without focusing on their classes is another functionality provided by perception subsystem.…”
Section: Other Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, global localization has to be performed only when localization has failed. However, exact failure detection of localization is challenging owing to the use of the independent assumption to the LiDAR measurements (Akai et al, 2022(Akai et al, , 2019Thrun et al, 2005). Even though the presented method estimates reliability of the localization result, it is difficult to perfectly classify whether localization has failed using the estimated reliability.…”
Section: Global Localization and Its Fusion With Pose Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%